Attitudes of elite athletes with impairments toward one another: A hierarchy of preference

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 197-210

  Mastro, James V ^a   Burton, Allen W ^a   Rosendahl, Marjorie ^a   Sherrill, Claudine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; ATTITUDE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; DWARFISM; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARAPLEGIA; QUADRIPLEGIA; REHABILITATION; UNITED STATES; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 0029863870     PISSN: 07365829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.13.2.197     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alessi, D., & Anthony, W. (1969). The uniformity of children's attitudes toward physical disabilities. Exceptional Children, 35, 543-545.
2. Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Antonak, R., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
4. Atha, B. (1994). Issues in classification for the mentally handicapped. In R.D. Steadward, E.R. Nelson, & G.D. Wheeler (Eds.), Vista '93: The outlook (pp. 304-309). Edmonton, AB: Rick Hansen Center.
5. Aufsesser, P.M. (1982). Comparison of the attitudes of physical education, recreation and special education majors toward the disabled. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 36, 35-41.
6. Berk, R.A. (1979). Generalizability of behavioral observations: A clarification of interobserver agreement and interobserver reliability. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 460-472.
7. Bogardus, E.S. (1932-33). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research, 17, 265-271.
8. Bouffard, M. (1993). The perils of averaging data in adapted physical activity research. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10, 371-391.
9. Coleman, J.W., & Cressey, D.R. (1993). Social problems (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College.
10. Dendy, E. (1994). Integration issues in sport for people with disabilities: An overview. In R.D. Steadward, E.R. Nelson, & G.D. Wheeler (Eds.), Vista '93: The outlook (pp. 359-366). Edmonton, AB: Rick Hansen Center.
11. DePauw, K., & Clarke, K. (1986). Sports for disabled U.S. citizens: Influence of the Amateur Sports Act. In C. Sherrill (Ed.), Sport and disabled athletes (pp. 41-50). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
12. Fichten, C.S. (1988). Students with physical disabilities in higher education: Attitudes and beliefs that affect integration. In H.E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 171-186). New York: Springer.
13. Fung, L. (1992). Participation motives in competitive sports: A cross-cultural comparison. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 114-122.
14. Grand, S.A., Bernier, I.E., & Strohmer, D.C. (1982). Attitudes toward disabled persons as a function of social context and specific disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 27, 165-173.
15. Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139-150.
16. Harasymiw, S.J., Horne, M.D., & Lewis, S.C. (1976). A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance. Rehabilitation Literature, 37(4), 98-102.
17. Holland, L. (1994). Issues of integration: A coach's perspective. In R.D. Steadward, E.R. Nelson, & G.D. Wheeler (Eds.), Vista '93: The outlook (pp. 352-358). Edmonton, AB: Rick Hansen Center.
18. Horne, M.D. (1985). Attitudes toward handicapped students: Professional, peer, and parent reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Katz, I. (1981). Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Labanovich, S. (1994). Integration: Anomalies and realities. In R.D. Steadward, E.R. Nelson, & G.D. Wheeler (Eds.), Vista '93: The outlook (pp. 345-351). Edmonton, AB: Rick Hansen Center.
21. Lemon, N. (1973). Attitudes and their measurement. New York: Wiley.
22. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, No. 140.
23. McCann, B.C. (1987). The structure and future of sport for the disabled: The Arnheim seminar. Palaestra, 3(4), 9-11, 40.
24. McClellan, R., & Frogley, M. (1994). The classification debate. In R.D. Steadward, E.R. Nelson, & G.D. Wheeler (Eds.), Vista '93: The outlook (pp. 260-268). Edmonton, AB: Rick Hansen Center.
25. Paciorek, M.J., & Jones, J.A. (1994). Sports and recreation for the disabled: A resource manual (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Benchmark Press.
26. Sage, G.H. (1990). Power and ideology in American sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
27. Semmel, M.I., & Dickson, S. (1966). Connotative reaction of college students to disability labels. Exceptional Children, 33, 443-450.
28. Shears, L., & Jensema, C.J. (1969). Social acceptance of anomalous persons. Exceptional Children, 36, 91-96.
29. Sherrill, C. (1986). Social and psychological dimensions of sports for disabled athletes. In C. Sherrill (Ed.), Sport and disabled athletes (pp. 21-33). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
30. Sherrill, C. (1989). Yang and yin of the 1988 Paralympics. Palaestra, 5(4), 53-59, 76.
31. Sherrill, C. (1993). Adapted physical activity, recreation and sport: Crossdisciplinary and lifespan (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
32. Sherrill, C., Paciorek, M., Davis, R., & Rich, S. (1993). Paralympics 1992: Excellence and challenge. Palaestra, 9(2), 25-56.
33. Sherrill, C., & Williams, T. (1995). Disability and sport: Psychosocial perspectives on inclusion, integration, and participation. Sport Science Review, 4(1), 1-23.
34. Steadward, R.D., Nelson, E.R., & Wheeler, G.D. (Eds.) (1994). The outlook companion: Vista '93. Edmonton, AB: Rick Hansen Center.
35. Strohmer, D.C., Grand, S.A., & Purcell, M.J. (1984). Attitudes toward persons with disability: An examination of demographic factors, social contact, and specific disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 29, 131-145.
36. Thorngate, W. (1986). The production, detection, and explanation of behavioral patterns. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology (pp. 71-93). New York: Plenum Press.
37. Thorngate, W. (1987). Ordinal pattern analysis: A method for assessing theory-data fit. In W.J. Baker, M.E. Hyland, A.W. Rappard, & A.W. Staats (Eds.), Current issues in theoretical psychology (pp. 345-364). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
38. Triandis, H.C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley.
39. Tringo, J.L. (1970). The hierarchy of preference toward disability groups. Journal of Special Education, 4, 295-306.
40. Tripp, A. (1988). Comparison of attitudes of regular and adapted physical educators toward disabled individuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 425-426.
41. Valsiner, J. (1986). Different perspectives on individual-based generalizations in psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual subject and scientific psychology (pp. 391-404). New York: Plenum Press.
42. Yuker, H.E. (Ed.). (1988). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities. New York: Springer.