Intensive care unit admissions following laparoscopic surgery: What lessons can be learned?

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 206-209

  Hayes, C ^a   Ambazidis, S ^a   Gani, J S ^a  

^a JOHN HUNTER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complications; Intensive care; Laparoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;

EID: 0029863770     PISSN: 00048682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb01165.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. The Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies N. Engl. J. Med. 1991; 324: 1073-8.
2. Scott TR, Zucker KA, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review of 12,397 patients. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 1992; 2: 191-8.
3. Dunn D, Nair R, Fowler S, McCloy R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England and Wales: Results of an audit by the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1994; 76: 269-75.
4. Fletcher DR, Smith R, Hollinshead J, Stubbs R, Worthley C, Machellan D. Assessing techniques of cholecystectomy: An example of the audit process at work. RACS Bull. 1991; 11: 35-7.
5. Cooks J, Johnson W, Cade R et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A report of the Standards subcommittee of the Victorian State Committee of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 1993; 63: 682-3.
6. Vallina V, Velasco J, McCulloch C. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Ann. Surg. 1993; 218: 685-92.
7. Sanabria J, Clavien P, Cywes R, Strasberg S. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: A matched study. Can. J. Surg. 1993; 36: 295-6.
8. Kum C, Wung C, Goh P, Ti T. Comparative study of pain levels and analgesia requirements after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 1994; 4: 139-41.
9. Operative Laparoscopy Study Group. Postoperative adhesions development after operative laparoscopy: Evaluation of early second-look procedures. Fertil. Steril. 1991; 55: 700-4.
10. Hill AG, Finn P, Schroeder D. Postoperative fatigue after laparoscopic surgery. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 1993; 63: 946-51.
11. Delaunay L, Bonnet F, Cherqui D, Rimaniol JM, Dahan E, Atlan G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimally impairs postoperative cardiorespiratory and muscle performance. Br. J. Surg. 1995; 82: 373-6.
12. Orlando R, Russell JC, Lynch J, Mattie A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. Arch. Surg. 1993; 128: 494-9.
13. Delaitre B, Testa P, Dubois F et al. Complications of cholecystectomy by laparoscopic approach. Apropos of 6512 cases. Chirurgie 1992; 118: 92-102.
14. Windsor JA, Yokes DE. Early laparoscopic biliary injury: Experience in New Zealand. Br. J. Surg. 1994; 81: 1208-11.
15. Gouma DJ, Go PM. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1994; 253: 229-3.
16. Breton G, Poulin E, Fortin C, Mamazza J, Robert J. Clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of cholecystectomies performed under laparoscopy. Ann. Chir. 1991; 45: 783-90.
17. Safran D, Sgambati S, Orlando R. Laparoscopy in high-risk cardiac patients. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1993; 176: 548-54.
18. Drummond GB, Martin LV. Pressure-volume relationships in the lung during laparoscopy. Br. J. Anaesth. 1978; 50: 261-70.
19. Putensen-Himmer G, Putensen C, Lammer H, Lingnau W, Aigner F, Benzer H. Comparison of postoperative respiratory function after laparoscopy or open laparotomy for cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 675-80.
20. Vitale GC, Stephens G, Wieman TJ, Larson GM. Use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 1993; 114: 806-14.
21. Kozarek R, Gannan R, Baerg R, Wagonfield J, Ball T. Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnostic and therapeutic application of endoscopie retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch. Intern. Med. 1992; 152: 1040-3.