Prioritising elective care: A cost utility analysis of orthopaedics in the north west of England

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 182-189

  James, Marilyn ^a   St Leger, Selwyn ^b   Rowsell, Kathleen V ^c  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c South Lancashire Health Authority   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; ORTHOPEDICS; PURCHASING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0029863689     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.50.2.182     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wilcock GK. A comparison of total hip replacement in patients aged 69 years or less and 70 years or over. Gerontology 1981;27:85-8.
2. Wroblewski BM. Charnley low friction arthroplasty in patients under the age of 40 years. In: Sevastik J, Goldie I, eds. The young patient with degenerative hip disease. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1985.
3. Walker SJ, Sharma P, Parr N, Cavendish ME. The long-term results of the Liverpool mark II knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1986;68:111-16.
4. Eftekhar NS. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1987;225:207-217.
5. Daellenbach HG, Gillespie WJ, Daellenbach US. Economic appraisal of new technology in the absence of survival data - the case of total hip replacement. Soc Sci Med 1990; 31(12):1287-93.
6. Kind P, Rosser R, Williams A. Valuation of quality of life: some psychometric evidence. In: Jones-Lee MW. The value of life and safety. London: North Holland Publishing Co, 1982.
7. Gudex C, Kind P. The QALY Toolkit. Discussion paper 76. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1987.
8. EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16:199-208.
9. Yates J. Why are we waiting? Oxford. Oxford University Press, 1987.
10. Gudex C, Williams A, Jourdan M, Mason R, Maynard J, O'Flynn R, Rendall M. Prioritising waiting lists. Health Trends 1990;22(3):103-8.
11. Williams A. Health economics, priority setting and medical ethics: implications for multiple sclerosis. Discussion Paper 71. York: Centre for Health Economics. University of York, 1990.
12. EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16:199-208.
13. Brooks RG. EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy 1991;18:37-48.
14. Nord E. EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy 1991;18:25-36.
15. Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ, van der Mass PJ. Valuation of health states by the general public: feasibility of a standardized measurement procedure. Soc Sci Med 1990; 31(11):1201-6.
16. Kind P. Measuring valuations for health states: a survey of patients in general practice. Discussion Paper 76. York: Centre for Health Economics. University of York, 1990.
17. Kind P, Rosser R, Williams A. Valuation of quality of life: some psychometric evidence. In: Jones-Lee MW ed. The value of the life of safety. North Holland Publishing Co., 1982.
18. Hadorn DC. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. JAMA 265(17): 2218-25.
19. Dixon J, Welch HG. Priority setting: lesson from Oregon. Lancet 1991;337:891-4.
20. Williams A. Measuring quality of life: a comment. Sociology 1987;21(4):565-66.