Mechanical work adaptations of above-knee amputee ambulation

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 77, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 1209-1214

  Seroussi, Richard E ^a   Gitter, Andrew ^b,d   Czerniecki, Joseph M ^b   Weaver, Kelly ^c  

^a Rehabilitation and Spine Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; GAIT; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; KNEE AMPUTATION; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0029861303     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90151-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A, Munro C. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. Biomech 1991;24:63-75.
2. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A. Insights into amputee running: a muscle work analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:209-18.
3. Enoka RM, Miller DI, Burgess EM. Below-knee amputee running gait. Am J Phys Med 1982;61:66-84.
4. Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, DeGroot DM. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:142-8.
5. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:853-61.
6. Menard MR, McBride ME, Sanderson DJ, Murray DD. Comparative biomechanical analysis of energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:451-8.
7. Winter DA, Sienko SE. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomech 1988;21:361-7.
8. Hershler C, Milner M. Angle-angle diagrams in above-knee amputee and cerebral palsy patients. Am J Phys Med 1980;59:165-83.
9. Murray MP, Mollinger LA, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Linder MT. Gait patterns in above-knee amputee patients: hydraulic swing control vs constant-friction knee components. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:339-45.
10. Yang L, Solomonidis SE, Spence WD, Paul JP. The influence of limb alignment on the gait of above-knee amputees. J Biomech 1991;24:981-97.
11. Hale SA. Analysis of the swing phase dynamics and muscular effort of the above-knee amputee for varying prosthetic shank loads. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990;14:125-35.
12. DiAngelo DJ, Winter DA, Ghista DN, Newcombe WR. Performance assessment of the Terry Fox Jogging Prosthesis for aboveknee amputees. J Biomech 1989;22:543-58.
13. Winter DA. Energy generation and absorption at the ankle and knee during fast, natural, and slow cadences. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983; 175:147-54.
14. Gordon D, Robertson E, Winter DA. Mechanical energy generation, absorption and transfer amongst segments during walking. J Biomech 1980;13:845-54.
15. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd ed. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo Press, 1990.
16. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A, Weaver K. Effect of alterations in prosthetic shank mass on the metabolic costs of ambulation in aboveknee amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:348-52.
17. Winter D. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo Press, 1987.
18. Winter DA. Overall principle of lower limb support during stance phase of gait. J Biomech 1980;13:923-7.
19. Norkin CC, Levangie PK. Joint structure and function: a comprehensive analysis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis, 1992.