The geometric structure, construction, and interpretation of path- following (Trail-Making) Tests

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 651-661

  Vickers, Douglas ^a   Vincent, Nicola ^a   Medvedev, Andrei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; GEOMETRY; MENTAL CAPACITY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CHILD; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; TRAIL MAKING TEST;

EID: 0029861291     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199611)52:6<651::AID-JCLP7>3.0.CO;2-N     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AHERNE, W.A., & DUNNILL, M.S. (1982). Morphometry. London: Edward Arnold.
2. BARNSLEY, M. (1988a). Fractals everywhere. New York: Academic Press.
3. BARNSLEY, M. (1988b). Fractal modelling of real world images. In: H.-O. Peitgen & D. Saupe (Eds.), The science of fractal images (pp. 219-242). New York: Springer Verlag.
4. BORD, J. (1976). Mazes and labyrinths of the world London: Latimer New Dimensions, Ltd.
5. CORRIGAN, J D , & HINKELDEY, N.S. (1987). Relationship between parts A and B of the Trail Making Test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 43, 402-409.
6. COXETER, H.S.M. (1980). Introduction to geometry (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
7. CRAWFORD, J.R., PARKER, D.M , & MCKINLAY, W.W. (1992). A handbook of neuropsychological assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. CUTTING, J.E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
9. CUTTING, JE., & GARVIN, J.J (1987). Fractal curves and complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 42, 363-370.
10. ELITHORN, A. (1955). A preliminary report on a perceptual maze test sensitive to brain damage. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 18, 287-292.
11. ELITHORN, A., JONES, D., KERR, M., & LEE, D. (1964). The effects of the variation of two physical parameters on empirical difficulty in a perceptual maze test. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 31-37.
12. ELITHORN, A., KERR, M., & MOTT, J. (1960). A group version of a perceptual maze test. British Journal of Psychology, 51, 19-26.
13. FAUCONNIER, G. (1985). Mental spaces. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press (Reissued 1994. New York: Cambridge University Press).
14. FEIN, S. (1993). First drawings: Genesis of visual thinking. Pleasant Hill, CA: Exelrod Press.
15. FOSSUM, B., HOLMBERG, H., & REINVANG, I. (1992). Spatial and symbolic factors in performance on the Trail Making Test. Neuropsychology, 6, 71-75.
16. FRISHBERG, N. (1979). Historical change: From iconic to arbitrary. In E Klima & U. Bellugi (Eds.), The signs of language (pp. 65-83). Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
17. GIBSON, J.J. (1968). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London: George Allen & Unwin.
18. GOLDEN, C.J., OSMON, D.C., MOSES, J.A., & BERG, R.A. (1981). Interpretation of the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.
19. JOHNSON, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
20. KLESGES, R.C., FISHER L., PHELEY, A., & VASEY, M. (1984). A major validational study of the Halstead-Reitan in the prediction of CAT-Scan assessed brain damage in adults. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 29-34.
21. LAKOFF, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. LAKOFF, G. (1989). The current state of research on metaphor and cognitive topology. Duisburg: Linguistic Agency, University of Duisburg.
23. LAKOFF, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39-74.
24. LANGACKER, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, 1. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
25. LANGACKER, R. (1991). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. LAWLER, E.L. (1985). The traveling salesman problem: A guided tour of combinatorial optimization. Chichester: Wiley.
27. LEZAK, M.D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. LEZAK, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. MANDELBROT, B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co.
30. MANKTELOW, K.I., & OVER, D.E. (1993). Rationality: Psychological and philosophical perspectives. London: Routledge.
31. MATTHEWS, W.H. (1922). Mazes and labyrinths. New York: Dover Publications. (Reprinted 1970).
32. MCCRACKEN, L.M., & FRANZEN, M.D. (1992). Principal-components analysis of the equivalence of alternate forms of the Trail Making Test, Psychological Assessment, 4, 235-238.
33. MUNDY, J., & ZISSERMAN, A. (1992). Geometric invariance in computer vision. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
34. PEITGEN, H.-O., JÜRGENS, H., & SAUPE, D. (1992). Chaos and fractals: New frontiers of science. New York: Springer Verlag.
35. REITAN, R.M. (1955). The relation of the Trail Making Test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 393-394.
36. REITAN, R.M. (1958). The validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271-276.
37. REITAN, R.M. (1992). Trail Making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
38. REITAN, R.M., & TARSHES, E.L. (1959). Differential effects of lateralized brain lesions on the Trail Making Test. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 129, 157-262.
39. REITAN, R.M., & WOLFSON, D. (1988). Traumatic brain injury, Vol. II: Recovery and rehabilitation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
40. REITAN, R.M., & WOLFSON, D. (1992). Neuropsychological evaluation of older children. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
41. ROSSINI, E.D., & KARL, M.A. (1994). The Trail Making Test A and B: A technical note on their structural non-equivalence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 625-626.
42. SHEPARD, R.N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-477.
43. SPREEN, O., & STRAUSS, E. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. SWEETSER, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. TALMY, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum Press.
46. TRAUGOTT, E. (1985). 'Conventional' and 'dead' metaphors revisited. In W. Paprotte & R. Dirven (Eds.), Metaphors in language and thought (pp. 17-53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. TURVEY, M.T. (1992). Ecological foundations of cognition: Invariants of perception and action. In H. Pick, P. van den Broek, & D.C. Knill (Eds.), Cognition. Conceptual and methodological issues (pp. 85-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. VAN GOOL, L.J., MOONS, T., PAUWELS, E., & WAGEMANS, J. (1994). Invariance from the Euclidean geometer's perspective Perception, 23, 547-561.
49. VOSS, R.F. (1988). Fractals in nature: From characterization to simulation. In H -O. Peitgen & D. Saupe (Eds.), The science of fractal images (pp. 21-70) New York: Springer Verlag.
50. WEYL, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.