The Relationship between Memory, Suggestibility and Hypnotic Responsivity

American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 126-137

  Eisen, Mitchell L ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RATING SCALE; SUGGESTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DEFENSE MECHANISMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; REALITY TESTING; STUDENTS; SUGGESTION;

EID: 0029859417     PISSN: 00029157     EISSN: 21600562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1996.10403375     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baker, R. A., Haynes, B., & Patrick, B. S. (1983). Hypnosis, memory and incidental memory. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 25(4), 253-262.
2. Barnier, A. J. & McConkey, K. M. (1992). Reports of real and False Memories: The relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and context of memory test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(30), 521-527.
3. Bellezza, F. F. S. & Bower, J. M. (1981). Person Stereo types and memory for people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 856-865.
4. Eisen, M. L., Goodman, G. S., & Qin, J. (1995). The impact of dissociation, trauma, andstress arousal on the memory and suggestibility of abused and neglected children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
5. Eisen, M. L., & Henn-Haas, C. (1995, November). Suggestibility for events in and out of the context of hypnosis. In S. Lynn (Chair), Memory, Pseudomemory and Hypnosis. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Society for Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Austin TX.
6. Frischholz, E. J. (1990). Understanding the Postevent information contamination effect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Chicago.
7. Graham, K. R., & Green, L. D. (1981). Hypnotic Susceptibility related to an independent measure of compliance-alumniannual giving: A brief communication. InternationalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 66-76.
8. Gregg, V. H. (1987). Hypnotic pseudomemory: Continuing issues. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 4, 109-111.
9. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1986). The relationship between interrogative suggestibility and acquiescence: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(2), 195-199.
10. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). Historical background to suggestibility: How interrogative suggestibility differs from other types of suggestibility. Personality and Individual differences, 8(3), 347-355.
11. Hajek, P. & Spacek, J. (1987). Territory, hypnotic susceptibility, and social influence: A pilot study. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis., 4, 115-118.
12. Labelle, L., Laurence, J. R., Nadon, R., & Perry, C. (1990). Hypnotizability, preference for an imagic cognitive style, and memory creation in hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 222-228.
13. Laurence, J. R. & Perry, C. (1983). Hypnotically created memory among highly hypnotizable subjects. Science, 222, 523-524.
14. Linton, C. P., & Sheehan, P. W. (1994). The relationship between interrogative suggestibility and susceptibility to hypnosis. Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22(1), 53-64.
15. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 569-572.
16. Loftus, E. F., & Zanni, G. (1979). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of the question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86-88.
17. Lynn, S. J., Milano, M., & Weekes, J. R. (1992). Pseudomemory and age regression: An Exploratory Study. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis. 35(2), 129-137.
18. Lynn, S. J., Milano, M., & Weekes, J. R. (1991). Hypnosis and pseudomemories: the effects of prehypnotic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60, 318-326.
19. Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J. R. & Milano, M. (1989). Reality versus suggestion: Pseudomemory in hypnotized and simulating subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 98, 137-144.
20. McConkey, K. M., Labelle, L., Bibb, B. C., & Bryant, R. A. (1990). Hypnosis and Pseudomemory: The relevance of test context. Australian Journal of Psychology. 42, 197-205.
21. McClosky, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading post event information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 114, 1-16.
22. Murrey, G. J., Cross, H. J. & Whipple, J. (1992). Hypnotically created pseudomemories: Further Investigation into the –memory distortion or response bias— question. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 101(1), 75-77.
23. Orne, M. T. (1979). The use and misuse of hypnosis in the courtroom. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 437-448.
24. Perry, C; Nadon, R., & Button, J. (1992). The measurement of Hypnotic Susceptibility. In (Eds.) Fromm, E. & Nash, M. R. Contemporary Hypnosis research. New York:Guilford.
25. Putnam, P. H. (1979). Hypnosis and distortions in eyewitness memory. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27(4), 437-448.
26. Register P. A. & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1988). Hypnosis and Interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 9(3), 549-558.
27. Shames, M. L. (1981). Hypnotic Suggestibility and Conformity: On the mediational mechanism of suggestibility. Psychological Reports. 49, 563-565.
28. Sheehan, P. W., & Tilden, J. (1983). Effects of suggestibility and hypnosis on accurate and distorted retrieval from memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 9, 283-293.
29. Sheehan, P. W., & Tilden, J. (1984). Real and Simulated occurrences of memory distortion in hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93(1), 47-57.
30. Sheehan, P. W. & Tilden, J. (1986). The consistency of occurrences of memory distortion following hypnotic induction. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 24(2), 122-137.
31. Sheehan, P. W., Grigg, L., & McCann, T. (1984). Memory distortion following exposure to false information in hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93(3), 259-265.
32. Sheehan, P. W., Statham, D., & Jamison, G. A. (1991a). Pseudomemoryeffects and their relationship to level of susceptibility to hypnosis and state instruction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 130-137.
33. Sheehan, P. W., Statham, D. & Jamison, G. A. (1991b). Pseudomemory effects over time and hypnotic setting. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 39-44.
34. Shore, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, FormA. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologist Press.
35. Shore, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1963). Norms on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A, The International Journal of Clinical and ExperimentalHypnosis, 11(1), 39-47.
36. Shumaker, J. F. (1991). Human Suggestibility: Advances in theory, research and application. New York: Rutledge.
37. Spanos, N., Gwynn, M., Comer, S., Baltruweit, W., & de Groh, M. (1989). Are hypnotically induced psuedomemories resistant to cross examination? Law and Human Behavior. 13, 271-289.
38. Spanos, N., & McLean, J. (1986a). Hypnotically created pseudomemories: Memory distortions or response biases? British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 3, 155-159.
39. Spanos, N., & McLean, J. (1986b). Hypnotically created false reports do not demonstrate psuedomemories. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 3, 167-171.
40. Yuille, J. c. & McEwan, N. M. (1985). Use of hypnosis as an aid to eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 389-400.
41. Zelig, M., & Beidleman, W. B. (1981). The investigative use of hypnosis: A word of caution. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 3-12.