New integrated sensor pacemaker: Comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 11 II, 1996, Pages 1664-1671

  Leung, Sum Kin ^a   Lau, Chu Pak ^a,c   Tang, Man Oi ^b   Leung, Zoe ^b  

^a KWONG WAH HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^b QUEEN MARY HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

integrated sensor; rate response; submaximal and maximal exercise

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALGORITHM; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BODY MOVEMENT; CHRONOTROPISM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HUMAN; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; SENSOR; TREADMILL EXERCISE; WALKING;

EID: 0029858957     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03203.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Lau CP, Leung SK. Clinical usefulness of rate adaptive pacing systems: What should we assess? PACE 1994; 17:2233-2235.
2. Karlof I. Haemodynamic effect of atrial triggered versus fixed rate pacing at rest and during exercise in complete heart block. Acta Med Scand 1975; 197:195-206.
3. Leung SK, Lau CP, Wu CW, et al. Quantitative comparison of rate response and oxygen uptake kinetics between different sensor modes in multisensor rate adaptive pacing. PACE 1994; 17: 1920-1927.
4. Lau CP, Butrous GS, Ward DE, et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:833-838.
5. Lau CP, Leung SK. Clinical usefulness of rate adaptive pacing systems: What should we assess? PACE 1994; 17:2233-2235.
6. Lau CP, Wong CK, Cheng CH, et al. Importance of heart rate modulation on cardiac hemodynamics during postexercise recovery. PACE 1990; 13: 1277-1285.
7. Ronaszeki A. Haemodynamic consequences of the timing of atrial contraction during complete atrioventricular block. Acta Biomedica Lovaniensiais, 1989.
8. Nordlander R, Hedman A, Pehrsson JK. Rate responsive pacing and exercise capacity, (editorial) PACE 1989; 12:749-751.
9. Fananapazir L, Bennett DH, Monks P. Atrial synchronized ventricular pacing contribution of the chronotropic response to improved exercise performance. PACE 1983; 6:601-608.
10. Lau CP, Mehtha D, Toff W, et al. Limitations of rate response of activity sensing rate responsive pacing to different forms of activity. PACE 1988; 11:141-150.
11. Lau CP, Wong CK, Leung WH, et al. A comparative evaluation of a minute ventilation sensing and activity sensing adaptive-rate pacemakers during daily activities. PACE 1989; 12:1514-1521.
12. Kay GN, Ashar MS, Bubien R, et al. Relationship between heart rate and oxygen kinetics during constant workload exercise. PACE 1995; 18: 1853-1860.
13. Leung SK, Lau CP, Lee ISF, et al. Impact of sensor response on cardiac output during maximal and submaximal exercise in a pacemaker with combine sensors. (abstract) PACE 1995; 18:1805.
14. Lau CP, Ritchie D, Butrous GS, et al. Rate modulation by arm movements of the respiratory dependent rate responsive pacemaker. PACE 1988; 11: 744-752.
15. Toff WD, Leeds C, Joy M, et al. The effect of aircraft vibration on the function of an activity-sensing pacemaker. (abstract) Br Heart J 1987; 57:573.
16. Lau CP, Antoniou A, Ward DE, et al. Reliability of minute ventilation as a parameter for rate responsive pacing. PACE 1989; 12:321-330.
17. Cowell R, Morris-Thurgood J, Paul V, et al. Are we being driven to two sensors? Clinical benefits of sensor cross checking. PACE 1993; 16:1441-1444.
18. Lau CP, Leung SK, Lee SF, et al. Delayed exercise rate response kinetics due to sensor cross checking in a dual sensor rate adaptive pacing system: The importance of individual sensor programming. PACE 1996; 19:1021-1025.