Hemodynamic performances of small diameter CarboMedics and St. Jude valves

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 5, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1996, Pages

  De Paulis, Ruggero ^a,b   Sommariva, Luigi ^a   De Matteis, Giovanni M ^a   Polisca, Patrizio ^a   Tomai, Fabrizio ^a   Bassano, Carlo ^a   De Peppo, Alfonso Penta ^a   Chiariello, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b EUROPEAN HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA DISEASE; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART OUTPUT; HEART RATE; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 0029852736     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Blank RH, Pupello DF, Bessone LN, et al. Method of managing the small aortic anulus during valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1976;22:356-362
2. Manouguian S, Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979;78:402-408
3. Konno S, Imai Y, Nakajima M, Tetsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;70:920-927
4. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Russo F, et al. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:57-62
5. Gardin JM, Kozlowski J, Dabestani A, et al. Studies of Doppler aortic flow velocity during supine bicycle exercise. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:327-332
6. Chafizadeh ER, Zoghbi WA. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the St. Jude Medical prosthetic valve in the aortic position using the continuity equation. Circulation 1991;83:213-223
7. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, et al. Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurements of prosthetic valve gradients. A simultaneous Doppler- catheter study. Circulation 1989;80:504-514
8. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 1990;82:1467-1475
9. Henneke KH, Pongratz G, Bachmann. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:18-25
10. Gray RJ, Chaux A, Matloff JM, et al. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamics characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:321-327
11. Globitz S, Rodler S, Mayr H, et al. Doppler monographic evaluation of the Carbomedics bileaflet valve prosthesis: one-year experience. J Cardiac Surg 1992;7:9-16
12. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis- patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-24
13. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:637-643