Long-distance gene flow in the sedentary butterfly, Euphilotes enoptes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Evolution

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 1990-1999

  Peterson, Merrill A ^a,b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Allozymes; dispersal; Euphilotes enoptes; gene flow; isolation by distance; Lycaenidae; neighborhood size; phytophagous insect; stepping stone model

Indexed keywords

EUPHILOTES ENOPTES; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; LYCAENIDAE;

EID: 0029852475     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03586.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. ARCHIE, J., C. SIMON, AND D. WARTENBERG. 1985. Geographical patterns and population structure in periodical cicadas based on spatial analysis of allozyme frequencies. Evolution 39:1261-1274.
2. ARNOLD, R. A. 1983. Ecological studies of six endangered butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): Island biogeography, patch dynamics, and the design of habitat preserves. Univ. Calif. Publ. Entomol. 99.
3. BILTON, D. T. 1992. Genetic population structure of the postglacial relict diving beetle Hydroporus glabriusculus Aubé (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Heredity 69:503-511.
4. BRITTEN, H. B., P. F. BRUSSARD, D. D. MURPHY, AND P. R. EHRLICH. 1995. A test for isolation-by-distance in central Rocky Mountain and Great Basin populations of Edith's checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha). J. Hered. 86:204-210.
5. CALABRESE, D. 1979. Population and subspecific variation in Gerris remigis Say. Ent. News 85:27-28.
6. COCKERHAM, C. C., AND B. S. WEIR. 1993. Estimation of gene flow from F-statistics. Evolution 47:855-863.
7. COSTA, J. T., III., AND K. G. ROSS. 1993. Seasonal decline in intracolony genetic relatedness in eastern tent caterpillars: Implications for social evolution. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:47-54.
8. _. 1994. Hierarchical genetic structure and gene flow in macrogeographic populations of the eastern tent caterpillar (Malacosoma americanum). Evolution 48:1158-1167.
9. DORNFELD, E. J. 1980. The butterflies of Oregon. Timber Press, Forest Grove, OR.
10. EBER, S., R. BRAND, AND S. VIDAL. 1992. Genetic and morphological variation among populations of Oxynaparietina (Diptera: Tephritidae) across a European transect. Can. J. Zool. 70:1120-1128.
11. EGGENBERGER, F., AND M. ROWELL-RAHIER. 1991. Chemical defence and genetic variation. Interpopulational study of Oreina gloriosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Naturwissenschaften 78:317-320.
12. EHRLICH, P. R. 1965. The population biology of the butterfly, Euphydryas editha: 2. The structure of the Jasper Ridge colony. Evolution 20:327-336.
13. FAIRBAIRN, D. J. 1985. Comparative ecology of Gerris remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae) in two habitats: A paradox of habitat choice. Can. J. Zool. 63:2594-2603.
14. _. 1986. Does alary polymorphism imply dispersal polymorphism in the waterstrider, Gerris remigis? Ecol. Entomol. 11:355-368.
15. HARRISON, S. 1989. Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the Bay Checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. Ecology 70:1236-1243.
16. HUDSON, R. R., D. D. BOOS, AND N. L. KAPLAN. 1992. A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:138-151.
17. KIMURA, M. 1953. "Stepping-stone" model of population. Annu. Rep. Nat. Inst. Genet. Japan 3:62-63.
18. KIMURA, M., AND G. H. WEISS. 1964. The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49:561-576.
19. KING, P. S. 1987. Macro- and microgeographic structure of a spatially subdivided beetle species in nature. Evolution 41:401-416.
20. _. 1988. Distribution and genetic structure of two allopatric beetle (Coleoptera: Melyridae) species on rock outcrops in the southeast. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 81:890-898.
21. KOKOSKA, S., AND C. NEVISON. 1989. Statistical tables and formulae. Springer-Verlag, New York.
22. KUKUK, P. F., R. H. CROZIER, D. R. R. SMITH, G. C. EICKWORT, AND B. MAY. 1987. Macrogeographic genetic variation in the sweat bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) zephyrum. P. 364 in J. Eder and H. Rembold, eds. Chemistry and biology of social insects. Verlag, Munich, Germany.
23. LANOSTON, R. L., AND J. A. COMSTOCK. 1966. Life history of Philotes enoptes bayensis. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 42:102-108.
24. LAWRENCE, W. S. 1988. Movement ecology of the red milkweed beetle in relation to population size and structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 57:21-35.
25. LIEBHERR, J. K. 1986. Comparison of genetic variation in two carabid beetles (Coleoptera) of differing vagility. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79:424-433.
26. LOXDALE, H. D., I. J. TARR, C. P. WEBER, C. P. BROOKES, P. G. N. DIGBY, AND P. CASTAÑERA. 1985. Electrophoretic study of enzymes from cereal aphid populations. III. Spatial and temporal genetic variation of populations of Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Bull. Ent. Res. 75:121-141.
27. MCCAULEY, D. E. 1983. Gene flow distances in natural populations of Tetraopes tetraophthalmus. Evolution 37:1239-1246.
28. _. 1989. Extinction, colonization, and population structure: A study of a milkweed beetle. Am. Nat. 134:365-376.
29. MCCAULEY, D. E., AND W. F. EANES. 1987. Hierarchical population structure analysis of the milkweed beetle, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus (Forster). Heredity 58:193-201.
30. MCCAULEY, D. E., J. R. OTT, A. STINE, AND S. MCGRATH. 1981. Limited dispersal and its effect on population structure in the milkweed beetle Tetraopes tetraophthalmus. Oecologia 51:145-150.
31. MURPHY, R. W., J. W. SITES, D. G. BUTH, AND C. H. HAUFLER. 1990. Proteins I: Isozyme electrophoresis. Pp. 45-126 in D. M. Hillis and C. Moritz, eds. Molecular systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
32. NAPOLITANO, M., AND H. DESCIMON. 1994. Genetic structure of French populations of the mountain butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne L. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 53:325-341.
33. NEI, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283-292.
34. _. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70:3321-3323.
35. NURNBERGER, B., AND R. G. HARRISON. 1995. Spatial population structure in the whirligig beetle Dineutus assimilis: Evolutionary inferences based on mitochondrial DNA and field data. Evolution 49:266-275.
36. PETERSON, M. A. 1994. The role of topography and distance in isolating populations of the lycaenid butterfly, Euphilotes enoptes. Ph.D. diss. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
37. _. 1995. Phenological isolation, gene flow and developmental differences among low- and high-elevation populations of Euphilotes enoptes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Evolution 49:446-455.
38. PETERSON, M. A., AND R. F. DENNO. In press Life history strategies and the genetic structure of phytophagous insect populations. In S. Mopper and S. Strauss, eds. Host plant effects on local genetic variation in natural insect populations. Chapman and Hall, New York.
39. PORTER, A. H., AND H. GEIGER. 1995. Limitations to the inferences of gene flow at regional geographic scales - An example from the Pieris napi group (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Europe. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 54:329-348.
40. PRATT, G. F. 1988. The evolution and biology of Euphilotes biotypes. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of California, Riverside.
41. _. 1994. Evolution of Euphilotes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) by seasonal and host shifts. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 51:387-416.
42. PREZIOSI, R. F., AND D. J. FAIRBAIRN. 1992. Genetic population structure and levels of gene flow in the stream dwelling water-strider, Aquarius (= Gerris) remigis (Hemiptera: Gerridae). Evolution 46:430-444.
43. RANK, N. E. 1992. A hierarchical analysis of genetic differentiation in a montane leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Evolution 46:1097-1111.
44. RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
45. ROSENBERG, R. 1989. Genetic differentiation among populations of Weidemeyer's admiral butterfly. Can. J. Zool. 67:2294-2300.
46. SCHAEFFER, S. W., AND E. L. MILLER. 1992. Estimates of gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura determined from nucleotide sequence of the alcohol dehydrogenase region. Genetics 132:471-480.
47. SHIELDS, O. 1975. Studies on North American Philotes (Lycaenidae). IV. Taxonomic and biological notes, and new subspecies. Bull. Allyn Mus. 28:1-30.
48. _. 1977. Studies on North American Philotes (Lycaenidae). V. Taxonomic and biological notes, continued. J. Res. Lepid. 16:1-67.
49. SHIELDS, O., AND J. L. REVEAL. 1988. Sequential evolution of Euphilotes (Lycaenidae: Scolitantidini) on their host Eriogonum (Polygonaceae: Eriogonoideae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 33:51-93.
50. SLATKIN, M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:393-430.
51. _. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787-792.
52. _. 1993. Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264-279.
53. SLATKIN, M., AND H. E. ARTER. 1991. Spatial autocorrelation methods in population genetics. Am. Nat. 138:499-517.
54. SLATKIN, M., AND N. H. BARTON. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1349-1368.
55. SLATKIN, M., AND W. P. MADDISON. 1990. Detecting isolation by distance using phytogenies of genes. Genetics 126:249-260.
56. SOKAL, R. R., AND C. D. MICHENER. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 28:1409-1438.
57. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry. 2d ed. Freeman, New York.
58. SOKAL, R. R., N. L. ODEN, AND J. S. F. BARKER. 1987. Spatial structure in Drosophila buzzatii populations: Simple and directional spatial autocorrelation. Am. Nat. 129:122-142.
59. WEIR, B. S., AND C. C. COCKERHAM. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
60. WRIGHT, S. 1946. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31:39-59.
61. _. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15:323-354.