Pharmacy involvement in formulary development: Community pharmacists' views

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 153-155

  Hughes, Carmel M ^a   McFerran, Geraldine ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG COST; DRUG INFORMATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; PHARMACIST; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0029852160     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.1996.tb00858.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Constructing a practice formulary: a learning exercise. Drug Ther Bull 1991;29:25-6.
2. Field, J. Practice formularies. Practitioner 1993;237:586-8.
3. A prescription for improvement: Towards more rational prescribing in general practice. Audit Commission report. London: HM Stationery Office, 1994.
4. Pharmaceutical care: The future for community pharmacy. Report of the joint working party on the future role of community pharmaceutical services. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain on behalf of the Department of Health and the pharmaceutical profession, 1992.
5. Health and Personal Social Services Management Plan 1995/96-1997/98. Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland, Management Executive, 1994.
6. Hughes CM, McFerran G. A survey of GPs' views on pharmacist involvement in formulary development. Pharm J 1995;255:R38.
7. Nathan A, Sutters CA. A comparison of community pharmacists' and general practitioners' opinions on rational prescribing, formularies and other prescribing related issues. J R Soc Health 1993;113:302-7.
8. Bond CM, Sinclair HK, Taylor HJ, Duffus P, Reid J, Williams A. Pharmacists: A resource for general practice? Int J Pharm Pract 1995;3:85-90.
9. Ford S, Jones K. Integrating pharmacy fully into the primary health care team. Br Med J 1995;310:1620-1.
10. Marinker M, Reilly P. Judging rational prescribing. In: Marinker M, editor. Controversies in health care policies, challenges to practice. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1994:89-110.