Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: Assessment of hemodynamic and angioarchitectural patterns with gadolinium chelate-enhanced 3D spoiled gradient-recalled MRI and maximum intensity projection reformatted images

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 898-904

  Soyer, Philippe ^a,b   Dufresne, Anne Charlotte ^a   Somveille, Edith ^a   Scherrer, Antoine ^a  

^a FOCH HOSPITAL   (France)

^b HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

Liver, focal nodular hyperplasia; Liver, neoplasms; Magnetic resonance, contrast enhancement; Magnetic resonance, pulse sequences

Indexed keywords

CHELATION; DIAGNOSIS; GADOLINIUM; HEMODYNAMICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; GADOLINIUM CHELATES; HAEMODYNAMICS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; LIVER, FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE, CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE, PULSE SEQUENCE; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; PULSE SEQUENCE; SOURCE IMAGES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

GADOLINIUM CHELATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIVER HYPERPLASIA; LIVER TUMOR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029851607     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199611000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ishak KG, Rabin L. Benign hepatic tumors of the liver. Med Clin North Am 1975;59:995-1013.
2. Scatarige JC, Fishman EK, Sanders RC. The sonographic "scar sign" in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. J Ultrasound Med 1982;1:275-8.
3. Mathieu D, Rahmouni A, Anglade MC, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: assessment with contrast-enhanced turbo-FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 1991;180:25-30.
4. Lee MJ, Saini S, Hamm B, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: MR findings in 35 proved cases. AJR 1991;156:317-20.
5. Mattison GR, Glazer GM, Quint LE, Francis IR, Bree RL, Ensminger WD. MR imaging of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: characterization and distinction from primary malignant hepatic tumors. AJR 1987;148:711-5.
6. Mahfouz AE, Hamm B, Taupitz M, Wolf KJ. Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:133-8.
7. Soyer P, Roche A, Levesque M, Legmann P. CT of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15: 533-8.
8. Nokes SR, Baker ME, Spritzer CE, Meyers W, Herfkens RJ. Hepatic adenoma: MR appearance mimicking focal nodular hyperplasia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:885-7.
9. Wilbur AC, Gyi B. Hepatocellular carcinoma: MR appearance mimicking focal nodular hyperplasia. AJR 1987;149:721-2.
10. Lubbers PR, Ros PR, Goodman ZD, Ishak KG. Accumulation of technetium-99m sulfur colloid by hepatocellular adenoma: scintigraphic-pathologic correlation. AJR 1987;148:1105-8.
11. Welch TJ, Sheedy PF, Johnson CM, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: comparison of angiography, CT, US and scintigraphy. Radiology 1985;156:593-5.
12. Rogers JV, Mack LA, Freeny PC, Johnson ML, Sones PJ. Hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: angiography, CT, sonography and scintigraphy. AJR 1985;137:983-90.
13. Fechner RE, Roehm JOF Jr. Angiographic and pathologic correlation of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 1977; 1:217-24.
14. Edelman RR, Wallner B, Singer A, Atkinson DJ, Saini S. Segmented turbo-FLASH: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the liver with flexible contrast. Radiology 1990;177:515-21.
15. Low RN, Francis IR, Herfkens RJ. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging. AJR 1993;160: 501-9.
16. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Kroeker MA, et al. Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, GRE, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1992;184:687-94.
17. Taupitz M, Hamm B, Speidel A, Deimling M, Branding G, Wolf KJ. Multisection GRE: method for breath-hold MR imaging of the entire liver. Radiology 1992;183:73-9.
18. Rodgers PM, Ward J, Baudouin CJ, Ridgway JP, Robinson PJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the portal venous system: comparison with X-ray angiography. Radiology 1994;191: 741-5.
19. Van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA, Van Es HW, Stokking R, Dillon EH, Feldberg MAM. Variations in venous and segmental anatomy of the liver: two- and three-dimensional MR imaging in healthy volunteers. AJR 1994;162:1337-45.
20. Mugler JP, Brookeman JR. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Res Med 1990;15:152-7.
21. Foo TKF, Sawyer AM, Faulkner WH, Mills DG. Inversion in the steady state: contrast optimization and reduced imaging time with fast three-dimensional inversion-recovery-prepared GRE pulse sequences. Radiology 1994;191:85-90.
22. Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Nitz WR. MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence - initial experience in the brain. Radiology 1992;182:769-75.
23. Murakami T, Nakamura H, Tsuda K, et al. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by chemoembolization: evaluation with 3DFT MR imaging. AJR 1993;160:295-9.
24. Winter TC III, Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, Hommeyer SC, Mack LA. Hepatic arterial anatomy: demonstration of normal supply and vascular variants with three-dimensional CT angiography. Radiographics 1995;15:771-80.
25. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB Jr. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 1993;186:147-52.
26. Keller PJ, Drayer BP, Fram EK, Williams KD, Dumoulin CL, Souza SP. MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Radiology 1989;173:527-32.
27. Loubeyre P, Revel D, Garcia P, et al. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. AJR 1994;162:847-52.
28. Hamm B, Thoeni RF, Gould R, et al. Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;190:417-23.
29. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
30. Korin HW, Felmlee JP, Ehman RL, Riederer SJ. Adaptive technique for three-dimensional MR imaging of moving structures. Radiology 1990;177:217-21.
31. Soyer P, Roche A, Gad M, et al. Preoperative segmental localization of hepatic metastases: utility of three-dimensional CT during arterial portography. Radiology 1991;180:653-8.
32. Zeman RK, Davros WJ, Berman P, et al. Three-dimensional models of the abdominal vasculature based on helical CT: usefulness in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. AJR 994;162:1425-9.