Group peer review in psychiatry: The relationship to quality improvement and quality care

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 653-659

  Balla, Margaret ^a   Knothe, Barbara ^b   Lancaster, Jeanette ^b   Prager, Shirley ^c   Beatson, Josephine ^b  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b Monash University ^*  (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHIATRY; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 0029850753     PISSN: 00048674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00048679609062661     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Knothe B, Prager S Peer review: Victorian pilot study and programme. Australasian Psychiatry 1993; 1:66-67.
2. Beatson JA, Lancaster JE. Peer review of psychotherapeutic treatments in psychiatry: a review of the literature. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1993; 27:311-318.
3. Wilson CR. Strategies in health care quality. Toronto: W.B. Saunders, 1992.
4. Berwick DM. Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. New England Journal of Medicine 1989; 320:53-56.
5. Marton F. Phenomenography: a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought 1986, 21:28-49.
6. Marton F. Phenomenography, describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science 1981; 10:177-200.
7. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park. Sage Publications, 1990.
8. Guba EG, Lincoln YS Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.
9. Samuelowicz K, Bain JD. Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education 1992; 24:93-111.
10. Schon DJ. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
11. Balla M, Ramsden P. The roles of lecturers in curriculum: differences in understanding and interpretation. Melbourne: Australian Association for Research in Education, 1992.
12. Marton F, Saljo R. Approaches to learning. In: Marton F, Hounsell D, Entwistle N, eds. The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984
13. Donabedian A Twenty years of research on the quality of medical care. Evaluation and the Health Professions 1985; 8:243-265.
14. Berwick DM. Peer review and quality management: are they compatible? Quality Review Bulletin 1990; 16:246-251.