Logrank, play the winner, power and ethics

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 20, 1996, Pages 2135-2142

  Hallstrom, Al ^a   Brooks, Maria Mori ^a   Peckova, Monika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; ETHICS; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; RANDOMIZATION; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANTI-ARRHYTHMIA AGENTS; DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATIENT SELECTION; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TACHYCARDIA, VENTRICULAR;

EID: 0029847732     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961030)15:20<2135::AID-SIM355>3.0.CO;2-G     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Simon, R. 'A decade of progress in statistical methodology for clinical trials', Statistics in Medicine, 10, 1789-1817 (1991).
2. Rosenberger, W. F. and Lachin, J. M. 'The use of response-adaptive designs in clinical trials', Controlled Clinical Trials, 14, 471-484 (1993).
3. Hsieh, F. Y. 'Comparing sample size formulas for trials with unbalanced allocation using the logrank test', Statistics in Medicine, 11, 1091-1098 (1992).