The role of diagnostic imaging in women with breast implants

American Family Physician

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 2029-2036

  Barloon, Thomas J ^a   Young, Donald C ^a   Bergus, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST TUMOR; ECHOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REVIEW; SCREENING; SILICONE PROSTHESIS;

BREAST; BREAST IMPLANTS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; RUPTURE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0029843636     PISSN: 0002838X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bassett LW, Brenner RJ. Considerations when imaging women with breast implants. Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:979-81.
2. Mendelson EB. Imaging the post-surgical breast. Semin Ultrasound CTMR 1989;10:154-70.
3. Destouet JM, Monsees BS, Oser RF, Nemecek JR, Young VL, Pilgram TK. Screening mammography in 350 women with breast implants: prevalence and findings or implant complications. Am J Roentgenoi 1992;159:973-8.
4. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:469-73.
5. Hayes H, Vandergritt J, Diner WC. Mammography and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:1-8.
6. Silversteín MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P. The effect of silicone-gel-filled implants on mammography. Cancer 1991;68;1159-63.
7. Weinreb JC, Newstead G. MR Imaging of the breast. Radiology 1995;196:593-610.
8. Ganott MA, Harris KM, Ilkhanipour ZS, Costa-Greco MA, Augmentation mastoplasty: normal and abnormal findings with mammography and US. Radiographics 1992;12:281-95.
9. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Anderson ND, Sheth S, Chang BW, Hamper UM. Breast implant rupture: diagnosis with US. Radiology 1994;190:819-23.
10. Chilcote WA, Dowden RV, Paushter DM, Hale JC, Desberg AL, Singer AA. Detection with US of silicone gel breast implant leaks: a prospective analysis. Radiology 1993;189:155.
11. Gorcyzca DP, DeBruhl ND, Mund DF, Bassett LW. Linguine sign at MR imaging: does it represent the collapsed silicone implant shell? Radiology 1994;191:576-7.
12. Gorczyca DP, DeBruhl ND, Ahn CY, Hoyt A, Sayre JW, Nudell P, et al. Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model; comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US and CT. Radiology 1994;190:227-32.
13. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, Anderson ND, Chang BW, Sheth S, et al. Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US and mammography. Radiograpícs 1991;13:1323-36.
14. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, DeBruhl ND, Hayes MK, Gausche, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:407-10.
15. Mund DF, Farria DM, Gorczyca DP, DeBruhl ND, Ahn CY, Shaw WW, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings. Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:773-8.
16. Berg WA, Anderson ND, Zerhouni EA, Chang BW, Kuhlman JE. MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone breast implants: normal post-operative variants and diagnostic pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:575-8.
17. Berkel H, Birdsell DC, Jenkins H. Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer? N Engl J Med 1992;326:1649-53.
18. Steinbach BG, Hardt NS, Abbitt PI, Lanier L, Caffee HH. Breast implants, common complications, and concurrent breast disease. Radiographics 1993;13: 95-118.
19. Leibman AJ, Kruse B. Breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings after augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology 1990;174:195-8.