Standardizing the Technique of Measurement of the Collo-diaphyseal Angle

Medicine, Science and the Law

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 290-294

  Purkait, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HYDERABAD   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAPHYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MORPHOMETRICS; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0029841461     PISSN: 00258024     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002580249603600403     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Breathnach A. S. (1958) Frazer's Anatomy of the Human Skeleton. 5th ed. London, J. A. Churchill Ltd, pp. 5, 75 and 121-2.
2. Brinckmann P., Hoefert H. and Jongen H. Th. (1981) Sex differences in the skeletal geometry of the human pelvis and hip joint. J. Biomech. 14, 427-30.
3. Comas J. (1960) Manual of Physical Anthropology. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C Thomas.
4. Davivongs V. (1963) The femur of Australian aborigines. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 21, 457-67.
5. Gerven D. P. V. (1972) The contribution of size and shape variation to patterns of sexual dimorphism of human femur. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 37, 49-60.
6. Godycki M. (1957) Sur la certitude de détermination de sexe d'après le fémur, le cubitus, et l'humerus. Bull. et Mem. de la Soc. d'Anthrop. de Paris. T.8, ser. 10, Paris, Masson, 405-10.
7. Graham T. M. and Yarbrough J. D. (1968) Anthropometric studies of the long bones of the 'Shell Mound' Indians. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 28, 85-92.
8. Hoaglund V. T. and Low W. D. (1980) Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hongkong Chinese. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 152, 10-16.
9. Ingalls N. W. (1924) Studies on the femur. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 7, 207-55.
10. Kate B. R. (1967) The angle of the femoral neck in Indians. Eastern Anthrop. 20, 54-60.
11. Krogman W. M. and Iscan M. Y. (1986) The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, 2nd edn. Illinois, USA, Charles C. Thomas, pp. 200 and 259.
12. Last R. J. (1978) Anatomy - Regional and Applied, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone Longman Group, pp. 77-8, 85 and 95.
13. Löfgren L. (1956) Some anthropometric-anatomical measurements of the femur of Finns from the view point of surgery. Acta Chir. Scand. 110, 477-84.
14. Martin R. (1928) Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Vols I, II and III. Jena, Verlag Von Gustav Fischer.
15. Martin R. and Saller K. (1957) Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Vols I and II. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag.
16. Parsons F. G. (1913/1914) The character of English thigh bone: I. J. Anat. Physiol. 48, 238-67.
17. Parsons F. G. (1914/1915a) The character of English thigh bone: II. The difficulty of sexing. J. Anat. Physiol. 49, 335-61.
18. Parsons F. G. (1914/1915b) Measurement of medieval English femur. Nature 94, 643.
19. Pearson K. and Bell J. (1917/1919) A study of the long bones of the English skeleton. 1: The femur. In: Draper's Co. Research Memorandum. University of London. Chap. 1-4. Biom. Series, X.
20. Purkait, R. (1989) Determination of sex from human long bones of Madhya Pradesh, India. PhD Thesis, Delhi University, India.
21. Schofield G. (1959) Metric and morphologic features of the femur of New Zealand Maori. J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst. 89, 89-105.
22. Singh I. P. and Bhasin M. K. (1989) Anthropometry. Delhi, Bharati Bhawan Educational Publishers and Book Sellers, p. 142.
23. Singh S. P. and Singh S. (1975) Collo-diaphyseal angle of femur in North India. Indian Med. Gaz. 15, 11-14.
24. William P. L. and Warwick R. (1980) Gray's Anatomy. 36th edn. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, pp. 388, 389, 462 and 477.