Treatment of esophageal reflux by the insertion Angelchik's prosthesis: Analysis of the follow-up in 26 patients;Trattamento del reflusso esofageo mediante posizionamento di protesi di Angelchik: Analisi del follow-up in 26 pazienti

Minerva Chirurgica

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 273-278

  Franchello, A ^a   Olivero, G ^a   Mao, P ^a   Scavarda, B ^a   Bertoldo, U ^a   Deriu, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Esophageal reflux; Prosthesis, Angelchik

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DYSPHAGIA; EMERGENCY SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; ESOPHAGITIS; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS MOTILITY; FOLLOW UP; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMAN; ITALY; MANOMETRY; MORBIDITY; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL RISK; X RAY;

EVALUATION STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; HUMANS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0029839985     PISSN: 00264733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kmiot WA, Kirby RM, Akinola D, Temple JG. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatmet of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 1991;78:1181-4.
2. Maddem GJ, Myers JC, McIntosch N, Bridgewater FHG, Jamieson GG The effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on esophageal and gastric function. Arch Surg 1991;126:1418-22.
3. Starling JR, Reicheildefer MO, Pellett JR, Beizer FO. Treatment of sumptomatic gastroesophageal reflux using the angelchik prosthesis Ann Surg 1982; 195(6):686-91
4. Wale FJ, Royston CMS, Bennett JR, Buckton GK. Prospective study of the angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis Br J Surg 1985;72:520-4
5. Deakin M, Mayer D, Temple JG. Surgery for gastroesophageal reflux; the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the angelchik prosthesis. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 1989;71 (4):249-52.
6. Morris DL, Jones J, Evans DF et al. Reflux versus dysphagia; an objective evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis. Br J Surg 1985;72:1017-20
7. Purkiss SF, Argano VA, Kuo J, Lewis CT. Oesophageal erosion of an Angelchik prosthesis; surgical management using fundoplication. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992,6(9):517-8.
8. Durrans D, Armostrong CP, Taylor TV. The Angel chik anti-reflux prosthesis: some reservations. Br J Surg 1985;72:525-7.
9. Stuart RC, Daxson K, Keeling P, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TP. A prospective randomized trial of Angelchilk prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 1989;76:86-9.
10. Anglechik JP, Cohen R, Kravetz RE. A ten year appraisal of the anti-reflux prosthesis. Am J Gastropenterology 1983,78 671.
11. Evans DF, Robertson CS, Morris DL, Ledingham SJ, Doran J, Hardcastle JD. An objective long term evaluationof the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis Ann R Coll Surg Eng 1991;73 355-60.
12. Mugal MM, Bencewicz J, Marples M. Oesophageal manometry and pH recording does not predict the bad results of Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 1990;77:43-5.
13. Vollan G, Stangeland L, Soreide JA, Janssen CW, Svanes K. Long term results after Nissen fundoplication and Belsey Mark IV operation in pateintewith reflux esophagitis and stricture. Eur J Surg 1992, 158(6-7):357-60.
14. Gear MW, Gillison EW, Dowling BL. Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis. Br J Surg 1984;71:681-83