Cross-sectional and longitudinal uses of isoinertial, isometric, and isokinetic dynamometry

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1180-1187

  Abernethy, Peter J ^a   Jürimäe, Jaak ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

DISCRIMINATION; GENERALITY; RESISTANCE TRAINING

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM EXERCISE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ISOKINETIC EXERCISE; ISOMETRIC EXERCISE; MALE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MUSCLE TRAINING; NORMAL HUMAN; TRICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE;

EID: 0029836214     PISSN: 01959131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199609000-00015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ABERNETHY, P., J. JURIMAE, P. A. LOGAN, A. W. TAYLOR, and R. E. THAYER. Acute and chronic response of skeletal muscle to resistance exercise. Sports Med. 17:22-38, 1994.
2. ABERNETHY, P., G. WILSON, and P. LOGAN. Strength and power assessment: issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med. 19:401-417, 1995.
3. BAKER, D., G. WILSON, and B. CARLYON. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 68:350-355, 1994.
4. BALTZOPOULOS, V., J. G. WILLIAMS, and D. A. BRODIE. Isokinetic dynamometry: applications and limitations. Sports Med. 8:101-116, 1989.
5. BARATTA, R., M. SOLOMONOW, B. H. ZHOU, D. LETSON, R. CHUINARD, and R. D'AMBROSIA. Muscular activation: the role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am. J. Sports Med. 16:113-122, 1988.
6. CAIOZZO, V. J., J. J. PERRINE, and R. EDGERTON. Training induced alterations of the in vivo force velocity relationship of human muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 51:750-754, 1981.
7. DONS, B., K. BOLLERUP, F. BONDE-PETERSEN, and S. HANCKE. The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 40:95-106, 1979.
8. FITTS, R. H., K. S. MCDONALD, and J. M. SCHLUTER. The determinants of skeletal muscle force and power: their adaptability with changes in activity pattern. J. Biomech. 24(Suppl.):111-122, 1991.
9. HORTOBAGYI, T., F. I. KATCH, and P. F. LACHANCE. Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes: evidence for a general strength component. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 58:749-755, 1989.
10. HOUSTON, M. E., E. A. FROESE, ST. P. VALERIOTE, H. J. GREEN, and D. A. RANNEY. Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 51:25-35, 1983.
11. HOWARD, J. D. and R. M. ENOKA. Interlimb interactions during maximal efforts. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 19(Suppl):S3, 1988.
12. HUTCHINSON, D. L., R. R. ROY, S. C. BODINE, J. A. HODGSON, H. LEE. and V. R. EDGERTON. EMG amplitude patterns in proximal and distal portions of the cat semitendinosus during various motor tasks. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 19(Suppl.):S3, 1988.
13. KOMI, P. V. How important is neural drive for strength and power development in human skeletal muscle? In: Biochemistry of Exercise VI, B. Saltin (Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1986, pp. 515-529.
14. MORITANI, T. and H. A. DEVRIES. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the course of muscle strength gain. Am. J. Physical Med. 57:263-277, 1979.
15. NADONE, A., C. ROMANO, and M. SCHIEPPATI. Selective recruitment of high threshold motor units during voluntary isotonic lengthening of active muscles. J. Physiol. 409:451-471, 1989.
16. NAKAZAWA, K., Y. KAWAKAMI, T. FUKUNAGA, H. YANO, and M. MIYASHITA. Differences in activation patterns in elbow flexor muscles during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 66:214-220, 1993.
17. PAKKOLA, R., U. KUJALA, and U. RYTOKOSKI. Response of the trunk muscles to training assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and muscle strength. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 65:383-387, 1992.
18. PEARSON, D. R. and D. L. COSTILL. The effects of constant external resistance exercise and isokinetic exercise training on work induced hypertrophy. J. Appl. Sport Sci. Res. 2:39-41, 1988.
19. RASCH, P. J. and L. E. MOREHOUSE. Effect of static and dynamic exercise on muscular strength and hypertrophy. J. Appl. Physiol. 11:29-34, 1957.
20. RUTHERFORD, O. M. and D. A. JONES. The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 55:100-105, 1986.
21. SALE, D. G. Neural adaptation in strength. In: Human Muscle Power, N. L. Jones, N. McCartney, and A. J. McComas (Eds.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1986, pp. 289-304.
22. SALE, D. G., J. E. MARTIN, and D. E. MOROZ. Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 64:51-55, 1992.
23. TER HAAR ROMENY, B. M., J. J. D. VAN DER GON, and C. C. A. M. GIELEN. Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks. Exp. Neurol. 85:631-650, 1984.
24. VAN ZUYLEN, P. J., C. C. A. M. GIELEN, and J. J. D. VAN DER GON. Coordination and inhomogenous activation of human arm muscles during isometric torques. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1523-1548, 1988.
25. WILSON, G. J., A. D. LYTTLE, K. J. OSTROWSKI, and A. J. MURPHY. Assessing dynamic performance: a comparison of rate of force development tests. J. Strength Cond. Res. 9:176-181:1995.