Regulation of the chicken lysozyme locus in transgenic mice

Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

Volumn 6, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 285-297

  Bonifer, Constanze ^a   Huber, Matthias C ^a   Faust, Nicole ^a   Sippel, Albrecht E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Chicken lysozyme gene; evolution of gene regulation; genomic position effects; phased nucleosomes; transgenic mice

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME;

ANIMAL CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHICKEN; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCUS; GENOME; MACROPHAGE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; POSITION EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS GALLUS; MUS MUSCULUS;

EID: 0029834523     PISSN: 10454403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v6.i2-3.90     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Allshire RC, Javerzat J P, Redhead NJ, and Cranston G (1994): Position effect variegation at fission yeast centromeres. Cell 76:157-169.
2. Altschmied J, Müller M, Baniahmad S, Steiner S, and Renkawitz R (1989): Cooperative interaction of chicken lysozyme enhancer sub-domains partially overlapping with a steroid receptor binding site. Nucl Acids Res 17:4975-4991.
3. Artymink PJ., Blake CE, and Sippel AE, (1981): Genes pieced together - exons delineate homologous structures of diverged lysozymes. Nature 290:287-288.
4. Baniahmad A, Müller M, Steiner C, and Renkawitz R (1990): Modular structure of chicken lysozyme silencer: involvement of an unusual thyroid receptor binding site. Cell 61:729-740.
5. Bonifer C, Bosch F, Faust N, Schuhmann A, and Sippel AE (1994): Evolution of gene regulation as revealed by differential regulation of the chicken lysozyme transgene and the endogenous mouse lysozyme gene in mouse macrophages. Eur J Biochem 226:227-235.
6. Bonifer C, Hecht A, Saueressig H, Winter DM, and Sippel AE (1991): Dynamic chromatin: the regulatory domain organization of eukaryotic gene loci. J Cell Biochem 47:99-108.
7. Bonifer C, Vidal M, Grosveld F, and Sippel AE (1990): Tissue specific and position independent expression of the complete gene domain for chicken lysozyme in transgenic mice. EMBO J 9:2843-2848.
8. Bonifer C, Yannoutsos N, Krüger G, Grosveld F, and Sippel AE (1994). Dissection of the locus control function located on the chicken lysozyme gene domain in transgenic mice. Nucl Acids Res, 22:4202-4210.
9. Chung LP, Keshav S, and Gordon S (1988): Cloning the human lysozyme cDNA: inverted Alu repeat in the mRNA and in situ hybridization for macrophages and Paneth cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6227-6231.
10. Cross M, Mangelsdorf I, Wedel A, and Renkawitz R (1988): Mouse lysozyme M gene: Isolation, characterization and expression studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:6232-6236.
11. Cross M and Renkawitz R (1990): Repetitive sequence involvement in the duplication and divergence of mouse lysozyme genes. EMBO J 9:1283-1288.
12. Dorer DR and Henikoff S (1994): Expansion of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in Drosophila. Cell 77:993-1002.
13. Durrin LK, Mann RK, Clayne PS, and Grunstein M (1991): Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequences are required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell 65:1023-1031.
14. Ellis J, Talbot D, Dillon N, and Grosveld F (1993): Synthetic human β-globin 5′HS2 constructs function as partially active LCRs. EMBO J 12:127-134.
15. Fascher KD, Schmitz J, and Hörz W (1993): Structural and functional requirements for the chromatin transition at the PHO5 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae upon PHO5 activation. J Mol Biol 231:658-667.
16. Faust N, Bonifer C, Wiles MV, and Sippel AE (1994): An in vitro differentiation system for the examination of transgene activation in mouse macrophages. DNACell Biol 13:901-907.
17. Fritton HP, Igo-Kemenes T, Nowock J, Strech-Jurk U, Theisen M, and Sippel AE (1984): Alternative sets of DNase I-hypersensitive sites characterize the various functional states of the chicken lysozyme gene. Nature 311:163-165.
18. Fritton HP, Sippel AE, and Igo-Kemenes T (1983): Nuclease-hypersensitive sites in the chromatin domain of the chicken lysozyme gene. Nucleic Acids Res 11:3467-3485.
19. Gottschling DE, Aparicio BL, Billington BL, and Zakian VA (1990): Position effect at S. cerevisiae telomeres: reversible repression of PolII transcription. Cell 63:751-762.
20. Graf T, McNagny K, Brady G, and Frampton J (1992): Chicken "erythroid" cells transformed by the gag-myb-ets-encoding E26 leukemia virus are multipotent. Cell 70:201-213.
21. Grewal T, Theisen M, Borgmeyer U, Grussenmeyer T, Rupp RAW, Stief A, Qian F, Hecht A, and Sippel AE (1992): The -6.1-kilobase chicken lysozyme enhancer is a multifactorial complex containing several cell type-specific elements. Mol Cell Biol 12:2339-2350.
22. Hammer MF, Schilling JW, Prager EM, and Wilson AC (1987): Recruitment of lysozyme as a major enzyme in the mouse gut: duplication, divergence, and regulatory evolution. J Mol Evol 24:272-279.
23. Hauser H, Graf T, Greiser-Wilke I, Lindenmeier W, Grez M, Land H, Giesecke K, and Schütz G (1981): "Structure of Lysozyme Gene and Expression in the Oviduct and Macrophages". In: Hematology and Blood Transfusion 26, 175-178. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
24. Hecht A, Berkenstam A, Strömstedt P-E, Gustafsson J-A, and Sippel AE (1988): A progesterone responsive element maps to the far upstream steroid dependent DNase hypersensitive site of the chicken lysozyme gene. EMBO J 7:2063-2073.
25. Henikoff S (1990): Position effect variegation after 60 years. Trends Genet 6:422-426.
26. Huber MC, Bosch F, Sippel AE, and Bonifer C (1994): Chromosomal position effects in chicken lysozyme gene transgenic mice are correlated with suppression of DNaseI hypersensitive site formation. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4195-4201.
27. Huber MC, Graf T, Sippel AE, and Bonifer C (1995a): Dynamic changes in the chromatin of the chicken lysozyme gene domain during differentiation of multipotent progenitors to macrophages. DNA Cell Biol 14:397-402.
28. Huber MC, Krüger G, and Bonifer C (1995b): Genomic position effects lead to an inefficient reorganization of nucleosomes in the 5′ regulatory region of the chicken lysozyme locus in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res 24:1443-1452.
29. Irwin DM, Prager EM, and Wilson AC (1992): Evolutionary genetics of ruminant lysozymes. Animal Genetics 23:193-202.
30. Jantzen K, Fritton HP, and Igo-Kemenes T (1986): The DNase I sensitive domain of the chicken lysozyme gene spans 24 kb. Nucleic Acids Res 14:6085-6099.
31. Johnson LM, Fisher-Adams G, and Grunstein M (1992): Identification of a non basic domain in the histone H4 N-terminus required for repression of the yeast silent mating type loci. EMBO J 11:2201-2209.
32. Klages S, Möllers B, and Renkawitz R (1992): The involvement of demethylation in the myeloid-specific function of the mouse M lysozyme gene downstream enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res, 20:1925-1932.
33. Kylsten P, Kimbrell DA, Daffre S, Samakovlis C, and Hultmark D (1992): The lysozyme locus in Drosophila melanogaster: different genes are expressed in midgut and salivary gland. Mol Gen Genet 232:335-343.
34. McPherson CE, Shim E-Y, Friedman DS, and Zaret K (1993): An active tissue specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array. Cell 75:387-398.
35. Möllers B, Klages S, Wedel A, Cross M, Spooncer E, Dexter TM, and Renkawitz R (1992): The mouse lysozyme M gene domain: identification of myeloid and differentiation specific DNase I hypersensitive sites and of a 3′-cis acting regulatory element. Nucleic Acids Res 20:1917-1924.
36. Noll M (1974): Subunit structure of chromatin. Nature 251:249-251.
37. Owen JE, Schuktz DW, Taylor A, and Smith GR (1983): Nucleotide sequence of the lysozyme gene of bacteriophage T4. Analysis of mutations involving repeated sequences. J Mol Biol 165:229-248.
38. Peters CWB, Kruse U, Pollwein R, Grzeschik K-H, and Sippel AE (1989): The human lysozyme gene. Eur J Biochem 182:507-516.
39. Peterson CL and Tamkun JW (1995): The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? TIBS 20:143-156.
40. Phi-Van L and Strätling WH (1988): The matrix attachment regions of chicken lysozyme gene co-map with the boundaries of the chromatin domain. EMBO J 7:655-664.
41. Renauld H, Aparicio OM, Zierath PD, Billington BL, Chhablani SK, and Gottschling DE (1993): Silent domains are assembled continuously from the telomere and are defined by promoter distance and strength, and by SIR3 dosage. Genes Dev 7:1133-1145.
42. Richard-Foy H and Hager GL (1987): Sequence-specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid-inducible MMTV promotor. EMBO J 6:2321-2328.
43. Saueressig H (1994): Der Mechanismus der Lokuskontrollfunktion des Hühnerlysozymgens: Charakterisierung in stabil transfizierten Zellinien. PhD thesis University of Freiburg,
44. Schütz G, Nguyen-Huu MC, Giesecke K, Hynes NE, Groner B, Wurtz T, and Sippel AE (1978): Hormonal control of egg-white protein messenger RNA synthesis in the chicken oviduct. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 42:617-624.
45. Shaffer DC, Wallrath LL, and Elgin SCR (1993): Regulating genes by packaging domains: bits of heterochromatin in euchromatin? Trends Genetics 2:35-37.
46. Sippel AE, Schäfer G, Faust N, Saueressig H, Hecht A, and Bonifer C (1993): Chromatin domains constitute regulatory units for the control of eukaryotic genes. CSH Symp Quant Biol 58:37-44.
47. Sippel AE, Theisen M, Borgmeyer U, Strech-Jurk U, Rupp RAW, Püschel AW, Müller A, Hecht A, Stief A, and Grussenmeyer T (1988): Regulatory function and molecular structure of DNaseI-hypersensitive elements in the chromatin domain of a gene, pp. 355-369. In Kahl G. (ed): "The architecture of eukaryotic genes". Weinheim: Verlagsgesellschaft Chemie (VHC).
48. Taylor ICA, Workman JL, Schuetz TJ, and Kingston RE (1991): Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev 5:1285-1298.
49. Theisen M, Stief A, and Sippel AE (1986): The lysozyme enhancer: cell-specific activation of the chicken lysozyme gene by a far-upstream element. EMBO J 5: 719-724
50. Thoma F and Simpson RT (1985): Local protein-DNA interactions may determine nucleosome positions on yeast plasmids. Nature 315:250-252.
51. Thompson JS, Ling X, and Grunstein M (1994): Histone H3 terminus is required for telomeric silencing and silent mating type locus repression in yeast. Nature 369:245-247.
52. Truss M, Bartsch J, Schelbert A, Hache RJG, and Beato M (1995): Hormone induces binding of receptors and transcription factors to a rearranged nucleosome on the MMTV promoter in vivo. EMBO J 14:1737-1751.
53. Tsukiyama T, Becker PB, and Wu C (1994): ATP dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367:525-532.
54. Wall G, Varga-Weisz PD, Sandaltzopoulos R, and Becker P (1995): Chromatin remodeling by GAGA factor and heat shock factor at the hypersensitive Drosophila hsp26 promoter in vitro. EMBO J 14:1727-1736.
55. Wallrath LL and Elgin SCR (1995): Position effect variegation in Drosophila is associated with an altered chromatin structure. Genes Dev 9:1263-1277.
56. Wijgerde M, Grosveld F, and Fraser P (1995): Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature 377:209-213.
57. Wilson C, Bellen HJ, and Gehring WJ (1990): Position effects on eucaryotic gene expression. Ann Rev Cell Biol 6:679-714.
58. Zimmerman K, Legony E, Stewart V, Depinho R, and Alt FW (1990): Differential regulation of the N-myc gene in transfected cells and transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol 256:48-178.