The southern California Kaiser-Permanente Chemical Dependency Recovery Program evaluation: Results of a treatment outcome study in an HMO setting

Journal of Addictive Diseases

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 1-25

  Ershoff, Daniel ^a   Radcliffe, Anthony ^a   Gregory, Margaret ^a  

^a Southern California Permanente Medical Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTINENCE; ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; DAY CARE; DETOXIFICATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; OUTPATIENT; PREVALENCE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS; ALCOHOLISM; CALIFORNIA; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SAMPLING STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TEMPERANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0029829093     PISSN: 10550887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J069v15n03_01     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Grant BF, Harford TC, Chou P, Pickering R, Dawson DA, Stinson, FS, Noble J. Prevalence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1988. Alcohol Health Res World. 1991; 15:91-96.
2. Warner LA, Kessler RC, Hughes M, Anthony JC, Nelson, CB. Prevalence and correlates of drug use and dependence in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995; 52:219-229.
3. Primm BJ. Future outlook. Treatment improvement in substance abuse: In Lowinson JH, Ruiz P, Millman RB, and Langrod JG, eds. A comprehensive textbook. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams and Wilkins, 1992.
4. Hubbard, RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, Harwood HJ, Cavanaugh ER, Ginzburg HM. Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.
5. Simpson DD, Sells SB. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse. 1982; 2:7-29.
6. Gerstein DR, Johnson RA, Harwood HJ, Fountain D, Suter N, Malloy K. Evaluating recovery services: The California drug and alcohol treatment assessment (CALDATA). Sacramento, California: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, 1994.
7. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems: Report of a study by a committee of the Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
8. Walsh DC, Hongson RW, Merrigan DM, Levenson SM, Cupples LA, Heeren T, Coffman G, Berker CA, Barker, TA, Hamilton SK, McGuire TG, Kelly CA. A randomized trial of treatment options for alcohol-abusing workers. New England Journal of Medicine. 1991; 325:775-782.
9. Hoffmann NG, Miller NS. Perspectives of effective treatment for alcohol and drug disorders. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 1993; 16:127-140.
10. McLellan AT, Grisson GR, Brill P, Durell J, Metzger DS, O'Brien CP. Private substance abuse treatments. Are some programs more effective than others? J Subst Abuse Treat. 1993; 10:243-254.
11. Institute for Health Policy, Brandeis University. Substance abuse: The nation's number one health problem. Princeton, New Jersey: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 1993.
12. Miller WR. The effectiveness of treatment for substance abuse. Reasons for optimism. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9: 93-102.
13. Collins GB. Contemporary issues in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1993; 16:33-48.
14. Holder H, Longabaugh R, Milier WR, Rubonis AV. The cost-effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism: A first approximation. J Stud Alcohol. 1991; 52: 517-540.
15. Institute of Medicine. Treating drug problems, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1990.
16. Davis LJ, Hoffman NG, Morse RM, Luehr JG. Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS): The equivalence and validity of a computer-administered and an interviewer-administered format. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992; 16:250-254.
17. Hoffman, NG, Ninonuevo F. Concurrent validation of substance abusers self-reports against collateral information: Percent agreement vs. Kappa vs. Yule's Y. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1994; 18:231-237.
18. Hoffman, Norm (Vice President, CATOR/New Standards, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Personal Communication, 1995.
19. Babor TF, Brown J, Del Boca FK. Validity of self-reports in applied research on addictive behaviors: Fact or fiction. Behavioral Assessment. 1990; 12: 1-27.
20. Stark M, Cambell B. Personality drug use, and early attrition from substance abuse treatment. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1988; 14:402-408.
21. Bell DC, Williams, ML, Nelson R, Spence RT. An experimental test of retention in residential and outpatient programs. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1994; 20:331-340.
22. Wickizer T, Maynard C, Atherly A, Frederick M, Koepsell T, Krupski A, Stark K. Completion rates of clients discharged from drug and alcohol treatment programs in Washington state, American Journal of Public Health. 1994; 84: 215-221.
23. Simpson DD, Joe, GW, Rowan-Szal, G, Greener, J. Client engagement and change during drug abuse treatment, Journal of Substance Abuse. 1995; 7:117-134.
24. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992; 47:1102-1114.
25. Barnes HW, Aronson MD, Delbanco TL. Alcoholism-A guide for the primary care physician. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.