Effects of overlay symbology in night vision goggles on accommodation and attention shift

Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 67, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 1039-1047

  Schor, Clifton M ^a   Task, H Lee ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; COLLEGE STUDENT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DEVICE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NIGHT VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; DARKNESS; DATA DISPLAY; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EVALUATION STUDIES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICS; REACTION TIME; SENSORY AIDS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0029825364     PISSN: 00956562     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ahn SJ, Legge G, Luebker A. Reading speed and serial/parallel processing in vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32:1040-1.
2. Crane H, Steele CM. Accurate three dimensional eye tracker. Appl Optics 1978; 17:691-705.
3. Fincham EF, Walton J. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence. J Physiol 1957; 137:488-508.
4. Iavecchia JH, Iavecchia HP, Roscoe SN. Eye accommodation to head-up virtual images. Human Factors 1988; 30:689-702.
5. Intriligator J, Jankayama K, Cavanagh P. Attentive tracking of multiple moving objects at different scales. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32 ARVO Suppl, abs. #1831, p. 1040.
6. Kotulak J, Schor CM. The accommodative response to subthreshold blur and to perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon. Perception 1986; 15:7-15.
7. Nakayama K, Mackeben M. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Res 1989; 29:1631-47.
8. Norman J, Ehrlich S. Visual accommodation and virtual image displays: target detection and recognition. Human Factors 1986; 28:135-51.
9. Rogers B, Graham M. Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception 1979; 8:125-34.
10. Schor CM, Alexander J, Cormack L, Stevenson S. Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt 1992; 12:307-18.
11. Shapiro KL, Akinall K, Drake S. Stimulus complexity mediates target detection in visual attention search. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32 ARVO Suppl, abs. #1827, p. 1040.
12. Shiu LP, Pashler H. Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32 ARVO Suppl, abs. #1834, p. 1041.
13. Simons JC, Unger S, Craig JL. Night vision goggle head-up display for fixed-wing and rotary-wing special operations. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, [zip code] 1985. AAMRL-TR-85-044.
14. Takeda T, Iida T, Fakui Y. Dynamic eye accommodation evoked by apparent distance. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67:450-5.
15. Weintraub DJ, Ensing M. Human factors issues in head-up display design: the book of HUD. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Crew Systems Ergonomics Information and Analysis Center, (CSERIAC) [zip code] 1992.
16. Westheimer G. Mechanism of saccadic eye movements. Arch Ophthalmol 1954; 54:710-24.