Soil salinity effects on crop growth and yield - Illustration of an analysis and mapping methodology for sugarcane

Journal of Plant Physiology

Volumn 148, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 418-424

  Wiegand, Craig ^a   Anderson, Gerry ^a   Lingle, Sarah ^a   Escobar, David ^a  

^a KIKA DE LA GARZA SUBTROPICAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

benefit analysis; cost; crop growth; economic yield; ground truth; image analysis; mapping; reclamation; remote sensing; Saccharum spp.; Salinity; site specific management; soil electrical conductivity; soil salinity; spectral components analysis; SPOT; SPOT HRV; sugarcane; vegetation stress; videography; yield; yield components

Indexed keywords

SACCHARUM; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 0029823355     PISSN: 01761617     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80274-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BURROUGH, P. A.: Principles of Geographic Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 194 p. (1986).
2. BUSCHMANN, C., U. RINDERLE, and H. K. LICHTENTHALER: Detection of stress in coniferous forest trees with the VIRAF spectrometer. IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sens. 29, 96-100 (1991).
3. CARTER, D. L.: Problems of salinity in agriculture. In: POLJAKOFF-MAYBER, A. and J. GALES (eds.): Ecological Studies, Analysis, and Synthesis, Vol. 15, pp. 25-35, Plants in Saline Environments. Springer-Verlag, New York (1975).
4. CHEVREL, M., M. COURTOIS, and G. WEILL: The SPOT satellite remote sensing mission. Photogramm. Engin, and Remote Sens. 47, 1163-1171 (1981).
5. EVERITT, J. H., D. E. ESCOBAR, and J. R. NORIEGA: A high resolution mulrispectral video system. Geocarto Int. 6, 45-51 (1991).
6. JOSHI, G. V. and G. R. NAIK: Salinity effect on growth and photosynthetic productivity in sugarcane var. Co 740. Indian Sugar 27, 329-332 (1964).
7. LICHTENTHALER, H. K.: Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence in stress physiology and remote sensing. In: STEVEN, M. and J. A. CLARK (eds.): Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculuture, pp. 287-305. Butterworths Scientific Ltd., London (1990).
8. MAAS, E. V.: Crop salt tolerance. In: TANJI, K., K. (ed.): Agriculture Salinity Assessment and Management, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71, pp. 262-304. Amer. Soc. Civil Engineers, New York (1990).
9. MASS, E. V. and G. J. HOFFMAN: Crop salt tolerance - current assessment. J. Irrig. and Drainage 103 (IR2), 115-134 (1977).
10. NIX, HENRY: Simplified simulation models based on specified minimum data sets: The CROPEVAL concept. In: BERG, A. (ed.): Application of Remote Sensing to Agricultural Production Forecasting, pp. 151-170. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam (1981).
11. RHOADES, J. D.: Soluble salts. In: PAGE, A. L. (ed.): Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, pp. 167-178. Amer. Soc. of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin (1982).
12. RICHARDS, L. A. (ed.): Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Handbook No. 60. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1954).
13. RINDERLE, U. and H. K. LICHTENTHALER: The various chlorophyll fluorescence signatures as a basis for physiological ground truth control in remote sensing of forest decline. In: Intl. Geosc. and Remote Sens. Sympos., IGARSS '89, Vancouver, Vol. 2, pp. 674-677 (1989).
14. ROBINSON, F. E. and G. F. WORKER: Growth of sugarcane in areas irrigated with Colorado River water. Calif. Agric. 19, 2-3 (1965).
15. SHAW, M. E. A.: Aspects of the management of salinity on swelling clay soils in Jamaica. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) 59, 167-172 (1982).
16. SZABOLICS, I.: Salt-affected soils. The Chemical Rubber Company Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida (1989).
17. TANZI, K. K.: The nature and extent of agricultural salinity problems. In: TANZI, K. K. (ed.): Agriculture Salinity Assessment and Management, ASCE Manual and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 71, pp. 1-17. Amer. Soc. Civil Engineers, New York (1990).
18. THOMAS, J. R. and C. L. WIEGAND: Osmotic and matric suction effects on relative turgidity, temperature, and the growth of cotton leaves. Soil Science 109, 85-92 (1970).
19. WIEGAND, C. L. and A. J. RICHARDSON: Leaf area, light interception and yield estimates from spectral components analysis. Agron J. 76, 543-548 (1984).
20. _ Spectral components analysis. Rationale and results for three crops. Intl. J. Remote Sens. 8, 1011-1032 (1987).
21. WIEGAND, C. L., A. J. RICHARDSON, D. E. ESCOBAR, and A. H. GERBERMANN: Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote Sens. Environ. 35, 105-119 (1991).
22. WIEGAND, C. L., J. H. EVERITT, and A. J. RICHARDSON: Comparison of multispectral video and SPOT-1 HRV observations for cotton affected by soil salinity. Int. J. Remote Sens. 13, 1511-1525 (1992).
23. WIEGAND, C. L., J. D. RHOADES, D. E. ESCOBAR, and J. H. EVERITT: Photographic and videographic observations for determining and mapping the response of cotton to soil salinity. Remote Sens. Environ. 49, 212-223 (1994a).
24. WIEGAND, C. L., D. E. ESCOBAR, and S. E. LINGLE: Detecting growth variation and salt stress in sugarcane using videography. Proc. 14th Biennial Workshop, Color Aerial Photography and Videography for Resource Monitoring, pp. 185-200. Amer. Soc. Photogramm, and Remote Sens. Bethesda, Maryland (1994 b).