Exclusion from day surgery: A 1-year clinical audit

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1384-1385

  Clark, S K ^a,b   Grieve, J P ^a   Jarrett, P E M ^a  

^a KINGSTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY SURGERY; DAY CARE; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; VARICOSIS;

AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HERNIA, INGUINAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VARICOSE VEINS; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 0029822709     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800831018     Document Type: Short Survey

References (5)

1. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Guidelines for Day Case Surgery. London, 1985 (revised 1992).
2. Audit Commission. A Shortcut to Better Services. Day Surgery in England and Wales. London, 1990.
3. Audit Commission. All in a Day's Work: An Audit of Day Surgery in England and Wales. London, 1992.
4. Meridy HW. Criteria for selection of ambulatory surgical patients and guidelines for anesthetic management: a retrospective study of 1553 cases. Anesth Analg 1982; 61: 921-6.
5. McTaggart RA. Selection of patients for day care surgery. Canadian Anaesthetic Society Journal 1983; 30: 543-5.