Host relationships of fusiform rust disease: II. Genetic variation and heritability in typical and south Florida varieties of slash pine

Silvae Genetica

Volumn 45, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 149-153

  Nelson, C D ^a,b   Schmidtling, R C ^b   Doudrick, R L ^b  

^a International Paper   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme; Pinus elliottii var. densa; Pinus elliottii var. elliottii

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029821516     PISSN: 00375349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BECKER, W. A.: Manual of quantitative genetics. 4th Edition Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA. (1984).
2. DINUS, R. J: Phenotypic selection for fusiform rust resistance. In: Proc. 11th South. For. Tree Improv. Conf, 15 to 16 June 1971, Atlanta, GA. pp. 68-75 (1971).
3. DOUDRICK, R. L. and NELSON, C. D.: Complementary genetic interaction in fusiform rust disease on slash pine. (Abstract). Phytopath. 83:1415 (1993).
4. FALCONER, D. S.: Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd Edition. Longman, London (1982).
5. GRIGGS, M. M.: Fusiform rust infection and resistance after five years in two slash pine progeny tests. In: BARROWS-BROADDUS, J. and POWERS, H. R. (eds.): Rusts of hard pines working party conference, S2.06-10. IUFRO and USDA Forest Service, Athens, GA. pp. 21-31 (1984).
6. HODGE, G. R., WHITE, T. L., POWELL, G. L. and DE SOUZA, S. M.: Predicted genetic gains from one generation of slash pine tree improvement. South. J. Appl For. 13:51-56 (1989).
7. JEWELL, F. F. and MALLETT, S. L.: Resistance to fusiform rust in slash pine as shown by artificial inoculation. Phytopath 54:1294 (1964).
8. KINLOCH, B. B. and STONECYPHER, R. W.: Genetic variation in susceptibility to fusiform rust in seedlings from a wild population of loblolly pine. Phytopath. 59:1246-1255 (1969).
9. KINLOCH, B. B. and WALKINSHAW, C. H.: Resistance to fusiform rust in southern pines: How is it inherited? In: HIRATSUKA, Y., SAMOLI, J. K., BLENIS, P. V., CRANE, P. E. and LAISHLEY, B. L. (eds.).: Proc. IUFRO rusts of pine working party forestry conference, Banff, Alberta. Information Report NOR-X-317, Forestry Canada, Northwest Region. pp. 219-228 (1990).
10. KUHLMAN, E. G. and POWERS, H. R., JR.: Resistance responses in half-sib loblolly pine progenies after inoculation with Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. Phytopath. 78:484-487 (1988).
11. NANCE, W. L., TUSKAN, G. A., NELSON, C. D. and DOUDRICK, R. L.: Potential applications of molecular markers for genetic analysis of host-pathogen systems in forest trees. Can. J. For. Res 22:1036-1043 (1992).
12. NELSON, C. D., DOUDRICK, R. L., NANCE, W. L., HAMAKER, J. M. and CAPO, B.: Specificity of host:pathogen interaction for fusiform rust disease on slash pine. In: Proc. 22nd South. For Tree Improv. Conf., Atlanta, GA. pp. 403-410 (1993).
13. POWERS, H. R, JR. and KRAUS, J. F.: A comparison of fusiform rust-resistant loblolly pine seed sources. South J. Appl. For. 10:230-232 (1986).
14. POWERS, H. R., JR., KRAUS, J. F. and DUNCAN, H. J.: A seed orchard for rust resistant pines: Progress and promise. Georgia Forestry Commission Research Report 1 (1979).
15. POWERS, H. R., JR. and KUHLMAN, E. G.: Resistance of loblolly pine sources of fusiform rust in field tests. Res. Pap. SE-268. USDA Forest Service, Southeast. For. Exp. Sta., Asheville, NC (1987)
16. SAS Institute, Inc.: SAS procedures guide. Version 6 3rd Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (1990).
17. SCHMIDT, R A., POWERS, H. R., JR. and SNOW, G. A.: Application of genetic disease resistance for the control of fusiform rust in intensively managed southern pine. Phytopath. 71:993-997 (1981).
18. SLUDER, E. R.: Gains from first-cycle selection in slash and longleaf pines. Silvae Genetica 35:155-159 (1986).
19. SNOW, G. A., DINUS, R. J. and KAIS, A. G.: Variation in pathogenicity of diverse sources of Cronartium fusiforme on selected slash pine families. Phytopath. 65:170-175 (1975)
20. SNOW, G. A., DINUS, R. J. and WALKINSHAW, C. H.: Increase in virulence of Cronartium fusiforme on resistant slash pine. Phytopath. 66:511-513 (1976).
21. SNOW, G. A. and KAIS, A. G.: Technique for inoculation of pine seedlings with Cronartium fusiforme. In: BINGHAM, R. T. (ed.): Biology of rust resistance in forest trees. Proc. NATO-IUFRO advanced study institute. Misc. Pub. No. 1221 USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC 325-326 (1972).
22. SNOW, G. A., MATTHEWS, F. R., NANCE, W. L and FOSTER, G. S.: Effects of pollen source on loblolly pine resistance to Cronartium quercuum f. sp. fusiforme. For. Sci. 36:304-312 (1990).
23. SQUILLACE, A. E.: Geographic variation in slash pine (Pinus elliottii ENGELM.). Monograph 10. For. Sci. (1966).
24. WALKINSHAW, C. H., DELL, T. R. and HUBBARD, S. D.: Predicting field performance of slash pine families from inoculated greenhouse seedlings. Res. Pap. SO-160. USDA Forest Service, South. For. Exp. Sta., New Orleans, LA (1980).
25. WEIR, R. J and GODDARD, R. E.: Advanced generation operational breeding programs for loblolly and slash pine. In: Advanced Generation Breeding of Forest Trees, LSU South. Coop. Series Bull. 309 LSU, Baton Rouge, LA 21-25 (1986).
26. WELLS, O. O. and WAKELEY, P. C.: Geographic variation in survival, growth and fusiform-rust infection of planted loblolly pine. Monograph 11. For. Sci. (1966).
27. ZOBEL, B., BLAIR, R. and ZOERB, M.: Using research data - disease resistance. J. For. 69:386-389 (1971).