Linearity of pulsatile pressure-flow relations in the embryonic chick vascular system

Circulation Research

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 864-870

  Yoshigi, Masaaki ^a,b   Keller, Bradley B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

cycle length; embryonic impedance; frequency domain; linearity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CHICKEN; EMBRYO; HEART DEVELOPMENT; LINEAR SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 0029820629     PISSN: 00097330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.79.4.864     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Yoshigi M, Hu N, Keller BB. Dorsal aortic impedance in the stage 24 chick embryo following acute changes in circulating blood volume. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:H1567-H1606.
2. Burke RD, Wang D, Jones VM. Ontogeny of vessel wall components in the outflow tract of the chick. Anat Embryol. 1994;189:447-456.
3. Rosenquist TH, McCoy JR, Waldo KL, Kirby ML. Origin and propagation of elastogenesis in the developing cardiovascular system. Anat Rec. 1988;221:860-871.
4. Duband JL, Gimona M, Scatena M, Sartore S, Small JV. Calponin and SM 22 as differentiation markers of smooth muscle: spatiotemporal distribution during avian embryonic development. Differentiation. 1993;55:1-11.
5. Hughes AFW. The histogenesis of the arteries of the chick embryo. J Anat. 1942;77:266-287.
6. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental, and Clinical Principles. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1990.
7. Attinger EO, Anne A, McDonald DA. Use of Fourier series for the analysis of biological systems. Biophys J. 1966;6:291-304.
8. Dick DE, Kendrick JE, Matson GL, Rideout VC. Measurement of nonlinearity in the arterial system of the dog by a new method. Circ Res. 1968;22:101-111.
9. Bergel DH, Milnor WR. Pulmonary vascular impedance in the dog. Circ Res. 1965;16:401-415.
10. O'Rourke MF, Taylor MG. Vascular impedance of the femoral bed. Circ Res. 1966;18:126-139.
11. Noble MI, Gabe IT, Trenchard D, Guz A. Blood pressure and flow in the ascending aorta of conscious dogs. Cardiovasc Res. 1967;1:9-20.
12. Nichols WW, Conti CR, Walker WE, Milnor WR. Input impedance of the systemic circulation in man. Circ Res. 1977;40:451-458.
13. Keller BB. Overview: functional maturation and coupling of the embryonic cardiovascular system. In: Clark EB, Markwald RR, Takao A, eds. Developmental Mechanisms of Heart Disease. New York, NY: Futura; 1995:367-385.
14. Zahka KG, Hu N, Brin KP, Yin FCP, Clark EB. Aortic impedance and hydraulic power in the chick embryo from stages 18 to 29. Circ Res. 1989;64:1091-1095.
15. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 1951;88:49-92.
16. Milnor WR. Methods of measurement. In: Hemodynamics. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:294-334.
17. Quail AW, Cottee DBF, White SW. Limitations of a pulsed Doppler velocimeter for blood flow measurement in small vessels. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75:2745-2754.
18. Cuneo B, Hughes S, Benson DW Jr. Heart rate perturbation in chick embryos: a comparison of two methods. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:H1864-H1869.
19. Casillas CB, Tinney JP, Keller BB. Influence of acute alterations in cycle length on ventricular function in chick embryos. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H905-H911.
20. Fisher NI. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
21. Westerhof N, Bosman F, De Vries CJ, Noordergraaf A. Analog studies of the human systemic arterial tree. J Biomech. 1969;2:121-143.
22. Grant BJ, Paradowski LJ. Characterization of pulmonary arterial input impedance with lumped parameter models. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:H585-H593.
23. Milnor WR, Bergel DH, Bargainer JD. Hydraulic power associated with pulmonary blood flow and its relation to heart rate. Circ Res. 1966;19:467-480.
24. Stergiopulos N, Meister JJ, Westerhof N. Scatter in input impedance spectrum may result from the elastic nonlinearity of the arterial wall. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H1490-H1495.
25. Fung YC. Theoretical pulmonary microvascular impedance. Ann Biomed Eng. 1972;1:221-245.
26. Westerhof N, Elzinga G. Normalized input impedance and arterial decay time over heart period are independent of animal size. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:R126-R133.
27. Campbell KB, Burattini R, Bell DL, Kirkpatrick RD, Knowlen GG. Time-domain formulation of asymmetric T-tube model of arterial system. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:H1761-H1774.
28. Westerhof N, Elzinga G. Why smaller animals have higher heart rates. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1993;346:319-323.
29. Poelmann RE, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Mentink MMT, Bökenkamp R, Hogers B. Development of the cardiac coronary vascular endothelium, studied with antiendothelial antibodies, in chicken-quail chimeras. Circ Res. 1993;73:559-568.