A comparison of two column agglutination technologies for routine antibody screening using the indirect antiglobulin technique

British Journal of Biomedical Science

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 193-195

  Byrne, T ^a   Nolan, T ^a   O'Donnell, R ^a  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Antibody screening; Column agglutination; Indirect antiglobulin test

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN ANTIBODY; SEPHADEX;

ANTIBODY DETECTION; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY REACTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHROCYTE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SERODIAGNOSIS;

BLOOD GROUPING AND CROSSMATCHING; COOMBS' TEST; HUMANS; ISOANTIBODIES;

EID: 0029819998     PISSN: 09674845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Lapierre Y, Rigel D, Adams J et al. The gel test: a new way to detect red cell antigen-antibody reactions. Transfusions 1990; 30:109-13.
2. Reiss KJ, Chachowski R, Cupido A, Davies D, Jakway J, Setcavage TM. Column agglutination technology: the antiglobulin test. Transfusion 1993; 33:639-43.
3. Bromilow IM, Eggington JA, Owen GA, Duguid JKM. Red cell antibody screening and identification: a comparison of two column technology methods. Br J Biomed Sci 1993; 50:329-33.
4. Voak D, Downie DM, Moore BPL, Ford DS, Englefriet CP, Case J. Quality control of anti-human globulin tests: use of replicate tests to improve performance. Biotest Bull 1986; 1:41-52.