A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 103, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 939-

  Geary, Michael ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

AMNIOTOMY; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AMNION; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; OXYTOCIN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0029818113     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09924.x     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Cammu H, van Eckhout E. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 313–318.
2. O’Driscoll K, Meagher D, Boylan P, editors. Active Management of Labour. London: Mosby, 1993.
3. Department of Health. Changing Childbirth Part II: Survey of Good Communication Practices in Maternity Services. London: HMSO, 1993.