What needs to be said? Informed consent in the context of spinal anesthesia

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 525-527

  Liang, B A ^a   Truog, R D ^a   Waisel, D B ^a  

^a PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; IMPOTENCE; INFORMED CONSENT; INGUINAL HERNIA; LAW SUIT; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TESTIS ATROPHY;

EID: 0029812887     PISSN: 09528180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(96)00122-5     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. McKinney v. Nash, 120 Cal.App.3d 428, 174 CalRptr. 642 (1981).
2. Liang BA. Speaking for itself: the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in a case of pediatric anesthesia. J Clin Anesth (in press).
3. WP Keeton DB Dobbs RE Deeton Prosser and Keeton on the law of torts 5th ed 1984 West Publishing Co St. Paul, MN §32
4. McKinney v. Nash, 120 Cal.App.3d 428, 174 Cal.Rptr. 642 (1981) (quoting Cobbs v. Grant, 8 Cal.3d 229, 502 P.2d 1 (1972) and Truman v. Thomas, 27 Cal.3d 281, 611 P.2d 902 (1980)).