Bronchiectasis: Comparative assessment with thin-section CT and helical CT

Radiology

Volumn 200, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 673-679

  Lucidarme, Olivier ^a   Grenier, Philippe ^a,b   Coche, Emmanuel ^a   Lenoir, Stéphane ^a   Aubert, Bernard ^c   Beigelman, Catherine ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

Bronchi, CT; Bronchi, diseases; Computed tomography (CT), helical; Computed tomography (CT), radiation exposure; Computed tomography (CT), thin section

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRONCHIECTASIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE;

EID: 0029812025     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756913     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cooke JC, Currie DC, Morgan AD, et al. Role of computed tomography in diagnosis of bronchiectasis. Thorax 1987; 42:272-277.
2. Müller NL, Bergin CJ, Ostrow DN, Nichols DM. Role of computed tomography in the recognition of bronchiectasis. AJR 1984; 143:971-976.
3. Phillips MS, Williams MP, Flower CDR. How useful is computed tomography in the diagnosis and assessment of bronchiectasis? Clin Radiol 1986; 37:321-325.
4. Silverman PM, Godwin JD. CT-broncho-graphic correlations in bronchiectasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11:52-56.
5. Grenier P, Maurice F, Musset D, Menu Y, Nahum H. Bronchiectasis: assessment by thin-section CT. Radiology 1986; 161:95-99.
6. Young K, Aspestrand F, Kolbenstvedt A. High resolution CT and bronchography in the assessment of bronchiectasis. Acta Radiol 1991; 32:439-441.
7. Rang EY, Miller RR, Müller NL. Bronchiectasis: comparison of preoperative thin-section CT and pathologic findings in resected specimens. Radiology 1995; 195:649-654.
8. Engeler CE, Tashjian JH, Engeler CM, Geise RA, Holm JC, Ritenour ER. Volumetric high-resolution CT in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and bronchiectasis: diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose. AJR 1994; 163:31-35.
9. Naidich DP, McCauley DI, Khouri NF, Stitik FP, Siegelman SS. Computed tomography of bronchiectasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6:437-444.
10. Dixon RL, Ekstrand KE. A film dosimetry system for use in computed tomography. Radiology 1978; 127:255-258.
11. Geleijns J, Van Unnik JG, Zoetelief J, Zweers D, Broerse JJ Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:360-365.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
13. Fleiss JL Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971; 76:378-382.
14. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London, England: Chapman & Hall 1992.
15. Boyden EA. Segmental anatomy of the lungs. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1955.
16. McGuinness G, Naidich DP, Leitman BS, McCauley DI. Bronchiectasis: CT evaluation. AJR 1993; 160:253-259.
17. van der Bruggen-Boggaarts BAHA, van der Bruggen HMJG, van Waes PFGM, Lammers JWJ. Assessment of bronchiectasis: comparison of HRCT and spiral volumetric CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 15-19.
18. Begg CB, McNeil BJ. Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology 1988; 167:565-569.
19. Lynch DA, Newell JD, Tschomper BA, Cink TM, Newman LS, Bethel R. Uncomplicated asthma in adults: comparison of CT appearance of the lungs in asthmatic and healthy subjects. Radiology 1993; 188:829-833.
20. Desai SR, Wells AU, Cheah FK, Cole PJ, Hansell DM. The reproducibility of bronchial circumference measurements using computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:257-262.
21. Hansell DM, Wells AU, Rubens MB, Cole PJ. Bronchiectasis: functional significance of areas of decreased attenuation at expiratory CT. Radiology 1994; 193:369-374.
22. Munro NC, Cooke JC, Currie DC, Strickland B, Cole PJ. Comparison of thin section computed tomography with bronchography for identifying bronchiectatic segments in patients with chronic sputum production. Thorax 1990; 45:135-139.
23. Reiff DB, Wells AU, Carr DH, Cole PJ, Hansell DM. CT findings in bronchiectasis: limited value in distinguishing between idiopathic and specific types. AJR 1995; 165:261-267.
24. Joharjy IA, Bashi SA, Abdullah AK. Value of medium-thickness CT in the diagnosis of bronchiectasis. AJR 1987; 149:1133-1137.
25. Murata K, Khan A, Rojas K, Herman PG. Optimization of computed tomography technique to demonstrate the fine structure of the lung. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:170-175.
26. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchai G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 1992; 185:29-35.
27. Rémy-Jardin M, Rémy J. Comparison of vertical and oblique CT in evaluation of bronchial tree. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12:956-962.
28. Mini RL, Vock P, Mury R, Schneeberger PP. Radiation exposure of patients who undergo CT of the trunk. Radiology 1995; 195:557-562.