Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: A foundation for evidence-based perinatal medicine

Acta Paediatrica, International Journal of Paediatrics

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 647-655

  Ohlsson, A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS; PERINATOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0029809098     PISSN: 08035253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14116.x     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Swyer PR. Organisation of perinatal/neonatal care. Acta Paediatr 1993;82Suppl 385:1-18
2. Daniel I:6-16. THe Holy Bible
3. Lind J. A treatise of the scurvy (reprint of the 1753 publication). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1953
4. Fibiger J. Om serumbehandling af difteri. Hospitalstidende 1898;6:309-25
5. Fisher RA, Mackenzie WA. Studies in crop variation: II. The manurial response to different potato varieties. J Agric Sci 1923;13:315
6. Daniels M, Hill AB. Chemotherapy of pulmonary tuberculosis in young adults. BMJ 1952 I:1162-8
7. Cochrane AL. 1931-1971: A critical review with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicine for the year 2000. London: Office of the Health and Economics, 1979
8. Hetherington J, Dickersin K, Chalmers I, Meinert CL. Retrospective and prospective identification of unpublished controlled trials: lessons from a survey of obstetricians and pediatricians. Pediatrics 1989;84:374-80
9. Chalmers I, Hetherington J, Newdick M, Mutch L, Grant A, Enkin M, et al. The Oxford database of perinatal trials: developing a register of published reports of controlled trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986;7:306-24
10. Prendiville W, Elbourne D, Chalmers I. The effects of routine oxytocic administration in the management of the third stage of labour: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:3-16
11. Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989
12. Sinclair J, Bracken M, editors. Effective care of the newborn infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
13. Chalmers I, Dickersin K, Chalmers TC. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ 1992;305:786-8
14. Pearson K. Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. BMJ 1904;3:1243-6
15. Olkin I. Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:133-46
16. Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;5:3-8
17. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88
18. Kramer M. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Org 1987; 65:663-737
19. Kemper K, Horwitz RI, McCarthy P. Decreased serum bilirubin with plain agar: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 1988;82:631-8
20. Ozminkowski RJ, Wortman PM, Roloff DW. Inborn/butborn status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Stat Med 1988;7:1207-21
21. Ohlsson A. Treatments of preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160: 890-906
22. Ohlsson A, Wang E. An analysis of antenatal tests to detect infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:809-18
23. Da Silva O, Ohlsson A, Kenyon C. Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995;14:362-6
24. Goldbloom R, Battista RN. The periodic health examination: 1. Introduction. Can Med Assoc J 1986;134:721-3
25. Basch CE. Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 1987;14:411-48
26. Jones R. Why do qualitative research? BMJ 1995;311:2
27. Oxman AD. Preparing and maintaining systematic reviews. In: Oxman A, editor. The Cochrane Collaboration tool kit. Oslo: Department of Health Services Research. National Institute of Public Health, 1994
28. Dickersin K, Berlin JA. Meta-analysis: state of the science. Epidemiologic Rev 1992;14:154-76
29. Silverman WA. Human experimentation: a guided step into the unknown. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985
30. Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology. The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders, 1985
31. Gøtzsche PC. Bias in double-blind trials. Dan Med Bull 1990;37:329-36
32. Tyson JE, Furzan JA, Reisch JS, Mize SG. An evaluation of the quality of therapeutic studies in perinatal medicine. J Pediatr 1983;102:10-3
33. Ornstein M, Ohlsson A, Edmonds J, Asztalos E. Neonatal follow-up of very low birth weight/extremely low-birth weight infants to school age. A critical review. Acta Paediatr Scand 1991;80:741-48
34. Ohlsson A, Lacy JB. Perinatal clinical epidemiology. Curr Opin Pediatr 1993;5:142-9
35. Lacy JB, Ohlsson A. Behavioral outcomes of environmental or care giving hospital-based interventions for preterm infants: a critical overview. Acta Paediatr 1993;82:408-15
36. Ohlsson A, Myhr TL. Intrapartum chemoprophylaxis of perinatal group B streptococcal infections. A critical review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170: 910-7
37. Lacy JB, Ohlsson A. The administration of intravenous immunoglobulins for prophylaxis or treatment of infection in preterm infants: meta-analyses. Arch Dis Child 1995; 72:F151-5
38. Wang EEL, Ohlsson A, Kellner J. Meta-analyses of studies linking Ureaplasma urealyticum and chronic lung disease. J Pediatr 1995;127:640-4
39. Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, Penman M, Tugwell P, Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Controlled Clin Trials 1995;16:62-73
40. Chalmers TC, Smith H J, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, et al. A method for assessing quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials 1981;2:31-49
41. Emerson JD, Burdick E, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1990;11:339-52
42. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273:408-12
43. Jadad AR. Meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials in pain relief [D. Phil. thesis]. Oxford: University of Oxford, 1994
44. Greenland S. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140: 290-6
45. Olkin I. Invited commentary: re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods". Am J Epidemiol 1994;140: 297-9
46. Feinstein AR. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:71-9
47. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetric and gynecology journals. JAMA 1994; 272:125-8
48. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group. A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994;272:1926-31
49. Bier DM, Fulginiti VA, Garfunkel JM, Lucey JF, Spranger J, Valman B, et al. Duplicate publication and related problems. Acta Paediatr 1992;81:573-4
50. Keirse MJNC, van Hoven M. Reanalysis of a multireported trial on home uterine activity monitoring. Birth 1993;20: 117-22
51. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 1991;44:1271-8
52. Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1728-33
53. Chalmers I, Hetherington J, Elbourne D, Keirse MJNC, Enkin M. Materials and methods used in synthesizing evidence to evaluate the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:39-65
54. Bracken MB. Statistical methods for analysis of effects of treatment in overviews of randomized trials. In: Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, editors. Effective care of the newborn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:13-18
55. Petitti DB. Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994
56. Sinclair JC, Bracken MB. Clinically useful measures of effect in binary analyses of randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47:881-9
57. Sinclair JC, Torrance GW. The use of epidemiological data for prognostication and decision-making. In: Goldworth A, Silverman W, Stevenson DK, Young EWD, Rivers R, editors. Ethics and perinatology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:120-45
58. Riegelman R, Schroth WS. Adjusting the number needed to treat: incorporating adjustments for the utility and timing of benefits and harms. Med Decis Making 1993;13:247-52
59. Chalmers I. "Applying overviews and meta-analyses at the bedside": discussion. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:67-70
60. Midgette AS, Stukel TA, Littenberg B. A meta-analytic method for summarizing diagnostic test performances: receiver-operating-characteristic-summary point estimates. Med Decis Making 1993;13:253-7
61. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48:119-30
62. Jones DR. Meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies: a review. J R Soc Med 1992;85:165-8
63. Berlin JA, Laird NM, Sacks HS et al. A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. Stat Med 1989;6:217-409
64. Thompson SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 1994;309:1351-5
65. Lennarson Greer A. Scientific knowledge and social consensus. Controlled Clin Trials 1994;15:431-6
66. Mulrow CD. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Int Med 1987;106:485-8
67. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Can Med Assoc J 1988;138:697-703
68. Ohlsson A. Systematic reviews - theory and practice. Scan J Clin Lab Invest 1994;54Suppl 219:25-32
69. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in health care. From the Potsdam Consultation on meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:167-70
70. Horbar JD. Prevention of periventricular intraventricular hemorrhage. In: Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, editors. Effective care of the newborn infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:562-89
71. Ment LR, Oh W, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Low dose indomethacin therapy and extension of intraventricular hemorrhage: a multicentre randomized trial. J Pediatr 1994;124:951-5
72. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1992;102:305S-11S
73. Felson DT. Bias in meta-analytic research. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:885-92
74. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H. Publication bias and clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1987; 8:343-53
75. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Ryan G, Clifton J, Buckingham L, Willan A, et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses. JAMA 1993;269:2749-53
76. Grégoire G, Derderian F, Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:159-63
77. Volpe JJ. Brain injury caused by intraventricular hemorrhage: is indomethacin the silver bullet for prevention? Pediatrics 1994; 93:673-6
78. Reynolds EOR. Prevention of periventricular hemorrhage. Pediatrics 1994;93:677-8
79. Ohlsson A, Bottu J, Govan J, Ryan ML, Fong K, Myhr T. Effect of indomethacin on cerebral blood flow velocities in very low birth weight neonates with a patent ductus arteriosus. Dev Pharmacol Therapeut 1993;20:100-6
80. National Institutes of Health. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Effect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes. NIH Publication No. 95-3784, Nov. 1994
81. Chalmers I, Haynes B. Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care. BMJ 1994:309: 862-5
82. Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994;272:122-4
83. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller E, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA 1992;268:240-8
84. Lau J, Schmid CH, Chalmers TC. Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:45-57
85. Sinclair JC. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antenatal corticosteroids for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome: Discussion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173: 335-44
86. Crowley P. Update of the antenatal steroid meta-analysis: current knowledge and future research needs. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US). Report of the Consensus Development Conference on the Effect of Corticosteroids for Fetal Maturation on Perinatal Outcomes: 1994 Feb 28 Mar 2: Bethesda. NIH Publication No. 95-3784, 1994: 161-205
87. Liggins GC, Howie RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 1972;50: 515-25
88. Harrison H. The principles for family-centered neonatal care. Pediatrics 1993;92:643-50
89. Veatch RM. Consensus of expertise: the role of consensus of experts in formulating public policy and estimating facts. J Med Philosophy 1991;16:427-45
90. Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM, Wyatt JC. Uptake of meta-analytical overviews of effective care in English obstetric units. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:297-301
91. Hyde C. Who uses the Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth database? BMJ 1995;310:1140-1
92. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992;268:1111-17
93. Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson GM, Hannah WJ, Vayda E, Singer J. Opinion leaders vs. audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA 1991;265:2202-7
94. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309:1286-91
95. Peto R, Collins R, Gray R. Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:23-40
96. Villar J, Carroli G, Belizán JM. Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1995;345: 772-6
97. Egger M, Smith GD. Misleading meta-analysis. Lessons from "an effective, safe, simple" intervention that wasn't. BMJ 1995; 310:752-4
98. Editorial. Your baby is in a trial. Lancet 1995;345:805-6
99. Slavin RE. Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:9-18
100. Canadian Institute of Child Health. The health of Canada's children. A CICH profile. Ottawa: Canadian Institute of Child Health, 1994