Changes in phenolic metabolites of scots-pine phloem induced by Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum, a bark-beetle-associated fungus

European Journal of Forest Pathology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 145-158

  Lieutier, F ^a   Sauvard, D ^a   Brignolas, F ^a   Picron, V ^a   Yart, A ^a   Bastien, C ^a,b   Jay Allemand, C ^a,b  

^a Inst Natl de la Rech Agronom   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029808081     PISSN: 03001237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1996.tb00719.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ALCUBILLA, M., 1970: Extraction, Chromatographic separation and isolation of fungistatic substances from the inner bark of Norway spruce. Z. Pflanz. Bodenk. 127, 64-74.
2. ANAS, E.; EKMAN, R.; HOLMBOM, B., 1983: Composition of nonpolar extractives in bark of Norway spruce and Scots pine. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 3, 119-130.
3. BELL, E. A.; CHARLWOOD, B. V., 1980: Secondary Plant Products. Encyclopedia of Plant Physiol, New series, Vol. 8. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. BERRYMAN, A. A., 1972: Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle fungus associations. BioScience 22, 598-601.
5. BRIGNOLAS, F.; LACROIX, B.; LIEUTIER, F.; SAUVARD, D.; DROUET, A.; CLAUDOT, A.-C., YART, A.; BERRYMAN, A. A.; CHRISTIANSEN, E., 1995a: Induced responses in phenolic metabolism in two Norway spruce clones after wounding and inoculations with Ophiostoma polonicum, a bark-beetle-associated fungus. Plant Physiol. 109, 821-827.
6. _; LIEUTIER, F.; SAUVARD, D.; YART, A.; DROUET, A.; CLAUDOT, A.-C., 1995b: Changes in solublephenol content of Norway-spruce (Picea abies) phloem in response to wounding and inoculation with Ophiostoma polonicum. Eur. J. Forest Path. 25, 253-265.
7. CHRISTIANSEN, E.; HORNTVEDT, R., 1983: Combined Ips/Ceratocystis attack on Norway spruce, and defensive mechanisms of the trees. Z. angew. Entomol. 96, 110-118.
8. _; WARING, R. H.; BERRYMAN, A. A., 1987: Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. Forest Ecol. Manage. 22, 89-106.
9. DELORME, L.; LIEUTIER, F., 1990: Monoterpene composition of the preformed and induced resins of Scots pine, and their effect on bark beetles and associated fungi. Eur. J. For. Path. 20, 304-316.
10. FEUCHT, W.; SCHMID, P. P. S., 1983: Selective histochemical staining of flavonols (catechins) with p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde in shoots from some fruit crops. Gartenbauwissenschaft 48, 119-124.
11. HART, J. H., 1981: Role of phytostilbenes in decay and disease resistance. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 19, 437-458.
12. _; SHRIMPTON, D. M., 1979: Role of stilbenes in resistance of wood to decay. Phytopathology 69, 1138-1143.
13. HILLIS, W. E., 1962: The distribution and formation of polyphenols within the tree. In: Wood extractives. Ed. by HILLIS, W. E. New York: Academic Press. pp. 59-131.
14. IVANOVA, S. Z.; MEDVEDEVA, S. A.; TJUKAVKINA, N. A., 1978: Acetophenones from needles of some species of the Pinaceae family. Khimiya drevesiny (Riga) 1, 103-108.
15. JAY-ALLEMAND, C.; CAPELLI, P.; BRUANT, B.; CORNU, D., 1988: Variabilité clonale in vitro de noyers hybrides (Juglans nigra' Juglans regia). Relations avec le contenu polyphénolique des pousses. Agrimed. 2ème Colloque Noyer-Noisetier. Rapport Eur. 12005, Bordeaux, France, pp. 79-87.
16. KEMP, M. S.; BURDEN, R. S., 1986: Phytoalexins and stress metabolites in the sapwood of trees. Phytochemistry 25, 1261-1269.
17. KINDL, H., 1985: Biosynthesis of stilbenes. In: Biosynthesis and Biodegradation of Wood Components. Ed. by HIGUCHI, T. New York: Academic Press. pp. 349-377.
18. Kuc, J.; SHAIN, L., 1977: Antifungal compounds associated with disease resistance in plants. In: Antifungal Compounds, Vol. 2. Ed. by SIEGEL, M. R.; SISLER, H. D. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp.497-535.
19. LÅNGSTRÖM, B; HELLQVIST, C.; ERICSSON, A.; GREF, R., 1992: Induced defence reaction in Scots pine following stem attacks by Tomicus piniperda. Ecography 15, 318-327.
20. LIEUTIER, F., 1993: Induced defence reaction of conifers to bark beetles and their associated Ophiostoma species. In: Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma. Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity. Ed. by WINGFIELD, M. J.; SEIFERT, K. A.; WEBBER, J. F. Saint Paul: APS Press. pp. 225-233.
21. _; BERRYMAN, A. A.; MILLSTEIN, J. A., 1991a: Preliminary study of the monoterpene response of three pines to Ophiostoma clavigerum (Ascomycetes: Ophiostomatales) and two chemical elicitors. Ann. Sci. for. 48, 377-388.
22. _; GARCIA, J.; ROMARY, P.; YART, A.; JACTEL, H.; SAUVARD, D., 1993: Inter-tree variability in the induced defense reaction of Scots pine to single inoculations by Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum, a bark-beetle-associated fungus. Forest Ecol. Manage. 59, 257-270.
23. _; YART, A.; GARCIA, J.; HAM, M.-C., MORELET, M.; LéVIEUX, J., 1989: Champignons phytopathogènes associés à deux Coléoptères Scolytidae du Pin sylvestre (Pinus sylvestris L.) et étude préliminaire de l'agressivité envers l'hôte. Ann. Sci. for. 46, 201-216.
24. _; _; JAY-ALLEMAND, C.; DELORME, L., 1991b: Preliminary investigations on phenolics as a response of Scots pine phloem to attacks by bark beetles and their associated fungi. Eur. J. For. Path. 21, 354-364.
25. MACHEIX, J.-J., FLEURIET, A.; BILLOT, J., 1990: Fruit Phenolics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
26. MULLICK, D. B., 1977: The non-specific nature of defence in bark and wood during wounding insect and pathogen attack. In: Recent Advances in Phytochemistry, Vol. 2. Ed. by LOEWUS, F. A.; RUNECKLES, V. C. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 395-441.
27. POPOFF, T.; THEANDER, O., 1977: The constituents of conifer needles. VI. Phenolic glucosides from Pinus sylvestris. Acta Chem. Scand. 31, 329-337.
28. PRIOR, C., 1976: Resistance of Corsican pine to attack by Heterobasidion annosum. Ann. Bot. 40, 261-279.
29. RAFFA, K. F.; BERRYMAN, A. A., 1982: Physiological differences between lodgepole pines resistant and susceptible to the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Environ. Entomol. 2, 486-492.
30. _; _, 1983: The role of host resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 53, 27-49.
31. _; KLEPZIG, K. D., 1992: Tree defense mechanisms against fungi associated with insects. In: Defense Mechanisms of Woody Plants against Fungi. Ed. by BLANCHETTE, R. A.; BIGGS, A. R. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 354-389.
32. REID, R. W.; WHITNEY, H. S.; WATSON, J. A., 1967: Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungi. Can. J. Bot. 45, 1115-1126.
33. RENNERFELT, E.; NACHT, G., 1955: The fungicidal activity of some constituents from heartwood of conifers. Svensk bot. Tidskr. 49, 419-432.
34. REZNIK, H.; EGGER, R., 1961: Benedikts Reagenz als Indikator für phenolische ortho-Dihydroxygruppen. Z. anal. Chem. 183, 196-199.
35. ROBEREAU-GAYON, P., 1968: Les Composés Phénoliques des Végétaux. Paris: Dunod.
36. ROSEMANN, D.; HELLER, W.; SANDERMANN H. JR, 1991: Biochemical plant responses to ozone. II. Induction of stilbene biosynthesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol. 97, 1280-1286.
37. RUSSEL, C. E.; BERRYMAN, A. A., 1976: Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle: 1 - Monoterpene composition of Abies grandis pitch blisters and fungus-infected wounds. Can. J. Bot. 54, 14-18.
38. SAFRANYIK, L.; SHRIMPTON, D. M.; WHITNEY, H. S., 1975: An interpretation of the interaction between lodgepole pine, the mountain pine beetle, and its associated blue stain fungi in western Canada. In: Management of Lodgepole Pine Ecosystems. Ed. by BAUMGARTNER, D. M. Pullman: Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service. pp. 406-428.
39. SANDERMANN, H.; SCHMITT, R.; HELLER, W.; ROSEMANN, D.; LANGEBARTELS, C., 1989: Ozone induced early biochemical reaction in conifers. In: Acid Deposition: Sources, Effects and Controls. Ed. by LONGHURST, J. W. S. Herts: Letchworth. pp. 243-254.
40. SHAIN, L., 1979: Dynamic responses of differentiated sapwood to injury and infection. Phytopathology 69, 1143-1147.
41. SHRIMPTON, D. M., 1973: Extractives associated with the wound response of lodgepole pine attacked by the mountain pine beetle and associated microorganisms. Can. J. Bot. 51, 527-534.
42. THEANDER, O., 1982: Hydrophilic extractives from the needles of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Svensk Papperstidning 85, 64-68.
43. WONG, B. L.; BERRYMAN, A. A., 1977: Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle. 3 - Lesion development and containment of infection by resistant Abies grandis inoculated with Trichosporium symbioticum. Can. J. Bot. 55, 2358-2365.
44. WRIGHT, E., 1933: A cork borer method for inoculating trees. Phytopathol. 23, 487-488.