Public-private interaction in pharmaceutical research

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 93, Issue 23, 1996, Pages 12725-12730

  Cockburn, Iain ^a   Henderson, Rebecca ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; COOPERATION; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG RESEARCH; ECONOMIC ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC OPINION; TEAMWORK;

EID: 0029804018     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12725     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arrow, K. (1962) in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, ed. Nelson, R. (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton), pp. 609-619.
2. Zucker, L. (1991) in Research in Sociology of Organizations, ed. Barley, S. & Tolbert, P. (JAI, Greenwich, CT), Vol. 8, pp. 157-189.
3. Merton, D. (1973) in The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation, ed. Starer, N. W. (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago), pp. 439-460.
4. Dasgupta, P. & David, P. A. (1987) in Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, ed. Feiwel, G. R. (N.Y. Univ. Press, New York), pp. 519-542.
5. Dasgupta, P. & David, P. A. (1994) Res. Policy 23, 487-521.
6. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M. (1994) Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5068 (Natl. Bureau Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA).
7. Jones, C. & Williams, J. (1995) Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D. Finance and Economics Discussion Series of the Division of Research in Statistics, Federal Reserve Board, Working Paper No. 95-39 (Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC).
8. Mansfield, E. (1991) Res. Policy 20, 1-12.
9. Griliches, Z. (1979) Bell J. Econ. 10, 92-116.
10. Griliches, Z. (1994) Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 1-23.
11. Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) Econ. J. 99, 569-596.
12. Gambardella, A. (1992) Res. Policy 21, 1-17.
13. Wurtman, R. & Bettiker, R. (1994) Neurobiol. Aging 15, S1-S3.
14. Ward, M. & Dranove, D. (1995) Econ. Inquiry 33, 1-18.
15. Koenig, M. & Gans, D. (1975) Res. Policy 4, 331-349.
16. Cockburn, I. & Henderson, R. (1994) J. Econ. Manage. Strategy 3, 481-519.
17. Henderson, R. & Cockburn, I. (1994) Strategic Manage. J. 15, 63-84.
18. Henderson, R. & Cockburn, I. (1995) RAND J. Econ. 27(1), 32-59.
19. Zucker, L., Darby, M. & Armstrong, J. (1994) Intellectual Capital and the Firm: the Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4946 (Natl. Bureau Econ. Res., Cambridge, MA).
20. David, P. A. (1994) in Economics of Technology, ed. Granstrand, O. (North-Holland, Amsterdam), pp. 65-89.