Group peer review: A questionnaire-based survey

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 643-652

  Beatson, Josephine ^a   Rushford, Nola ^b   Halasz, George ^c   Lancaster, Jeanette ^a   Prager, Shirley ^c  

^a University of Melbourne ^*  (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEER REVIEW; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 0029803599     PISSN: 00048674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00048679609062660     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beatson J, Lancaster J. Peer review of psychotherapeutic treatments in psychiatry: a review of the literature. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 1993; 27:311-318.
2. Schuster J. Ensuring highest quality care for the cost: coping strategies for mental health providers. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1991; 42:774-776.
3. Hoge SK. Utilisation review: a house divided. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1990; 41-367-368.
4. Karasu B. Ethical aspects of psychotherapy. In: Bloch S. Chodoff P, eds. Psychiatric ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991:135-166.
5. Simon RI. Sexual exploitation of patients: how it begins before it happens. Psychiatric Annals 1989; 19:104-112.
6. el-Guebaly N. Peer review empirical data base and practical implications. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1988; 33:645-649.
7. Theaman M. The impact of peer review on professional practice. American Psychologist 1984; 39:406-414.
8. Stricker G, Cohen LH. APA/CHAMPUS peer review projects: implications for research and practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 1984; 15:96-108.
9. Allen MG. Peer review of group therapy: Washington DC 1972-1977. American Journal of Psychiatry 1977; 136:444-447.
10. Gabbard GO, Takahashi T, Davidson J, Bauman-Bork M. Ensroth K. A psychodynamic perspective on the clinical impact of insurance review. American Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 148:318-323.
11. Sargent DA. Relentless review [letter]. Psychiatric News 1989; 1 September:26.
12. Knothe B, Prager S. Peer review: Victorian pilot study and programme. Australasian Psychiatry 1993; 1:66-67.
13. x User's Guide. New York: McGraw Hill, 1983.
14. Keppel G. Design and analysis: a researcher's handbook. New Jersey. Prentice Hall, 1973.
15. Kass F, Charles E, Buckly P. Two year follow-up of a peer review training program for residents. American Journal of Psychiatry 1980; 137:244-245.
16. MacInnes R. A model for effective clinical peer review. Australian Clinical Review 1990; 10:58-65.
17. Newman D, Luft L. The peer review process: education versus control. American Journal of Psychiatry 1974; 131.1363-1366.