Toward an evaluation of an integrated clinical imaging system: Identifying clinical benefits

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 221-229

  Kaplan, B ^a   Lundsgaarde, H P ^b  

^a QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical benefits; computer based patient record; evaluation; imaging; organizational aspects; PACS

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; IMAGING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029800726     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634674     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Dick RS, Steen EB, eds. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1991.
2. Gur D, Straub WH, Lieberman RH, Gennari RC. Clinicians' access to diagnostic imaging information at an academic center: Perceived impact on patient management. Am J R 1992; 158: 893-6.
3. Dayhoff RE, Maloney DL. An integrated multidepartmental hospital imaging system: Usage of data across specialties. In: Frisse ME, eds. SCAMC 1992. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992: 30-4.
4. Lowe HJ, Buchanan BG, Cooper GF, Kaplan B, Vries JK. Image Engine: An integrated multimedia clinical information system. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MEDINFO 95. Edmonton, Alberta: IMLA, Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada Inc., 1995: 421-5.
5. Englemann U, Jean FC, Meinzer JP et al. Integrated image processing in clinical applications: The HELIOS approach. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MEDINFO 95. Edmonton. Alberta: IMIA. Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada Inc., 1995: 411-5.
6. McNeill KM, Maloney K, Parra MV, Alsafadi Y. Digital distribution of chest radiographs to intensive care units. In: Greenes RA. Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MEDINFO 95. Edmonton, Alberta: IMIA. Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada Inc., 1995: 426-9.
7. Kaplan B. Fitting system design to work practice: Using observation in evaluating a clinical imaging system. In: Ahuja MK, Galletta DF, Watson HJ, eds. American Conference on Information Systems, Vol. IV: Information Systems-Collaboration Systems and Technology, and Organizational Systems and Technology. Pittsburgh: Association for Information Systems, 1995: 86-8.
8. Dayhoff RE. Integration of medical imaging into a multi-institutional hospital information system structure. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MEDINFO 95. Edmonton, Alberta: IMIA, Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada Inc., 1995: 407-410.
9. Cannavo MJ. Integrated information and image management systems for the 90s. American Hospital Association Hosp Technol Ser August 1990; 9: 21: 1-11.
10. Dwyer SJ, Templeton AW, Martin NL et al. The cost of managing digital diagnostic images. Radiology 1982; 144: 313-8.
11. Drew PG. Picture archiving and communication systems. Hospitals November 1, 1985; 59: 21: 78-86.
12. Vanden Brink J. What radiologists say about PACS. Am J R 1986; 146: 419-420.
13. Bakker AR, van Gennip EMSJ. Workshop aims, outline of the program. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 165-71.
14. Cannavo MJ. Low-risk strategy for PACS calls for modular phase-in. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 1988; 10: 6: 135-45.
15. Straub WH, Gur D. The hidden costs of delayed access to diagnostic imaging information: Impact on PACS implementation. Am J R 1990; 155: 613-8.
16. Racoveanu NT. Benefits of coordinated action in PACS evaluation. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 295-300.
17. Barneveld Binkhuysen FH. Required functionality of PACS from clinical point of view. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 187-91.
18. Kurdzeil JC, Kanz R. Administrative and organization impact of PACS and its effect on the quality of care. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 259-62.
19. Glass HI. The impact of PACS on the information flow. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 229-34.
20. van Gennip EMSJ, Bakker AR, Greberman M. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 151-2.
21. Crowe BI. Overview of some methodological problems in assessment of PACS. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 181-6.
22. Hindle R. Review of optical storage technology for archiving digital medical images. Radiology 1986; 161: 257-62.
23. Bakker AR, Stut WJJ Jr., de Valk JPJ, Reijns GR. PACS costs: Modelling and simulation. Med Inform 1988; 13: 4: 307-13.
24. Nudelman S, Healy J, Capp MP. A study of photoelectronic-digital radiology - Part II: Cost analysis of a photoelectronic-digital versus film-based system for radiology. IEEE 1982; 70: 708-14.
25. Seeley GW, Ovitt T, Capp MP. The total digital radiology department: An alternative view. Am J R 1985; 144: 421-2.
26. Lodwick GS. Pictorial information systems and radiology: Improving communications. Appl Radiol 1986; 15: 3: 18-32.
27. Stockburger WT, King WE. PACS: A financial analysis for economic viability. Appl Radiol 1990; 19: 1: 17-24.
28. Takeda H, Matsumura Y, Kondo H et al. System design and implementation of HIS, RIS, and PC-based PACS at the Osaka University Hospital. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MEDINFO 95. Edmonton, Alberta: IMIA, Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada Inc., 1995: 430-3.
29. Flagle CD. The influence of PACS on quality at the clinical level. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 255-8.
30. Seshardri SB, Arenson RL. The impact of PACS on Research and Education. Int J Biomed Comput 1992; 30: 3-4: 263-6.
31. Hillman Bruce J. The value of imaging technology to patients' health. Am J R 1988; 150: 1191-2.
32. Cannavo MJ. Component costs still deter most potential PACS users. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 1989; 11: 2: 163-5.
33. Gray JE, Karsell PR, Becker GP, Gehring DG. A skeptical look at a (digital) sacred cow. In: SPIE (Vol. 486) Medical Imaging and Instrumentation '84, 160-6. Slightly revised and reprinted in: Gray JE, Karsell PR, Becker GP, Gehring DG. Total digital radiology: Is it feasible? or desirable? Am J R 1984, 143: 1345-9.
34. Gray JE, Karsell PR, Becker GP, Gehring DG. A skeptical look at a (digital) sacred cow. In: SPIE (Vol. 486) Medical Imaging and Instrumentation '84, 160-6. Slightly revised and reprinted in: Gray JE, Karsell PR, Becker GP, Gehring DG. Total digital radiology: Is it feasible? or desirable? Am J R 1984, 143: 1345-9.
35. Rowberg AH, Price TD. The need and user requirements for integrating images with radiology reports. In: Clayton PD, ed. SCAMC 1991. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991: 163-7.
36. Humphrey LM, Fitzpatrick K, Paine S, Ravin CE. Extended experience with digital radiography and viewing in an ICU environment. In: SPIE (Vol 1654). Medical Imaging VI: PACS Design and Evaluation, 1992: 408-14.
37. DeSimone DN, Kundel HL, Arenson RL et al. Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit. Radiology 1988; 169: 1: 41-4.
38. Kaplan B. The influence of medical values and practices on medical computer applications. MEDCOMP 82. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1982: 83-8. Reprinted in: Anderson JG, Jay SJ, eds. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer, 1987: 39-50.
39. Kaplan B. The influence of medical values and practices on medical computer applications. MEDCOMP 82. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1982: 83-8. Reprinted in: Anderson JG, Jay SJ, eds. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer, 1987: 39-50.
40. Young DW. What makes doctors use computers?: Discussion paper. J Roy Soc Med 1984; 77: 663-7. Reprinted in: Anderson JG, Jay SJ, eds. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer, 1987: 8-14.
41. Young DW. What makes doctors use computers?: Discussion paper. J Roy Soc Med 1984; 77: 663-7. Reprinted in: Anderson JG, Jay SJ, eds. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer, 1987: 8-14.
42. Kaplan B. The medical computing "lag": Perceptions of barriers to the application of computers to medicine. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1987; 3: 1: 123-36.
43. Bryan S, Keen J, Buxton M, Weatherburn G. Evaluation of a hospital-wide PACS: Costs and benefits of the Hammersmith PACS installation. In: SPIE (Vol. 1654) Medical Imaging VI: PA CS Design and Evaluation, 1992: 573-6.
44. Kaplan B. A model comprehensive evaluation plan for complex information systems: Clinical imaging systems as an example. In: Brown A. Remenyi D, eds. European Conference on Information Technology Investment Evaluation, Birmingham, England: Operational Research Society, 1995: 174-81.
45. Kaplan B. Organizational evaluation of medical information systems. In: Friedman CP, Wyatt JC, eds. Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics. New York: Springer (in press).
46. Dayhoff RE, Kuzmak P, Maloney D. Medical images as an integral part of the patient's automated record. In: Symp Computer-Assisted Radiology, Baltimore. Md., 1992.
47. Dayhoff RE, Maloney DL, Kuzmak PM, Shepard BM. Integrating medical images into hospital information systems. J Digit Imaging 1991; 4: 87-93.
48. Dayhoff RE, Kuzmak PM, Maloney DL, Shepard BM. Experience with an architecture for integrating images into a hospital information system. In: Dunn RA, ed. IEEE Computer-Based Medical Sys-tems. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.
49. Kaplan B. An evaluation model for clinical information systems: Clinical Imaging Systems. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. MEDINFO 95. Edmonton, Alberta: IMIA, Healthcare Computing and Communications Canada. Inc., 1995: 1087.
50. Lundsgaarde HP, Gardner RM, Menlove RL. Using attitudinal questionnaires to achieve benefits optimization. In: Kingsland LC III, ed. SCAMC 1989. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989: 703-7.
51. Forsythe D, Buchanan BG. Broadening our approach to evaluating medical expert systems. In: Clayton PD, ed. SCAMC 1991. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991: 8-12.
52. Kaplan B, Maxwell JA. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems. In: Anderson JG, Aydin CE, Jay SJ, eds. Evaluating Health Care Information Systems: Methods and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994: 45-68.
53. Ramey J, Rowberg AH, Robinson C. Adaptation of an ethnographic method for investigation of the task domain in diagnostic radiology. In: SPIE (Vol 1654) Medical Imaging VI: PACS Design and Evaluation, 1992; 325-34.
54. Fafchamps D, Young CY, Tang PC. Modelling work practices: Input to the design of a physician's workstation. In: Clayton PD, ed. SCAMC 1991. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991: 788-92.
55. Tang PC, Jaworski MA, Fellencer CA et al. Methods for assessing information needs of clinicians in ambulatory care. In: Gardner RM ed. SCAMC 1995. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995: 630-4.
56. Barley SR. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Adm Sci Q 1986; 31: 78-108.
57. Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Osheroff JA, Miller RA. Expanding the concept of medical information: An observational study of physicians' information needs. Comput Biomed Res 1992; 25: 181-200.
58. Osheroff JA, Forsythe D, Buchanan BG et al. Physicians' information needs: Analysis of clinical questions posed during patient care activity. Ann Intern Med 1991; 4: 576-81.
59. Forsythe DE. Using ethnography to build a working system: Rethinking basic design assumptions. In: Frisse ME, ed. SCAMC 1992. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992: 505-9.
60. Kaplan B. Impact of a clinical laboratory computer system: Users' perceptions. In: Salamon R, Blum BI, Jörgensen MJ, eds. MEDINFO 86. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp, 1986: 1057-61.
61. Kaplan B. Initial impact of a clinical laboratory computer system: Themes common to expectations and actualities. J Med Syst 1987; 11: 137-47.
62. Kaplan B, Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Q 1988; 12: 571-86.
63. Kaplan B. and Duchon D. A job orientation model of impact on work seven months post implementation. In: Barber B. et al., eds. MEDINFO 89 Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ Comp. 1989: 1051-5.
64. Fischer PJ, Stratmann WC, Lundsgaarde HP, Steele DJ. User reaction to PROMIS: Issues related to acceptability of medical innovations. In: O'Neill JT, ed. SCAMC 1980. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1980: 1722-1730. Reprinted in: Anderson JG and Jay SJ, eds. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer, 1987: 284-301.
65. Fischer PJ, Stratmann WC, Lundsgaarde HP, Steele DJ. User reaction to PROMIS: Issues related to acceptability of medical innovations. In: O'Neill JT, ed. SCAMC 1980. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1980: 1722-1730. Reprinted in: Anderson JG and Jay SJ, eds. Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. New York: Springer, 1987: 284-301.
66. Lundsgaarde HP, Fischer PJ, Steele DJ, Human Problems in Computerized Medicine. Lawrence KS: University of Kansas Publications in Anthropology, No. 13, 1981.
67. Gardner RM, Lundsgaarde HP. Evaluation of user acceptance of a clinical expert system. JAMIA 1994; 1: 428-38.
68. Aydin C. Occupational adaptation to computerized medical information systems. J Health Soc Behav 1989; 30: 163-79.
69. Aydin C, Ischar R. The effects of computerized order entry on communication between pharmacy and nursing. In: Kingsland LC III, ed. SCAMC 1989. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989: 796-801.
70. Nyce JM, Graves W III. The construction of neurology: Implications for hypermedia system development. Artif Intell Med 1990; 2: 315-22.
71. Dayhoff RE, Maloney DL. Utilization of an integrated multidepartmental medical imagina system in a hospital environment. In: SPIE (Vol 1654) Medical Imaging VI: PACS Design and Evaluation, February 1992.
72. Goodman KW. Ethics and system evaluation. Physicians Comput 1994; 11(11): 12-4.
73. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine, 1967.
74. Kaplan B. Reducing barriers to physician data entry for computer-based patient records. Top Health Inf Manage 1994; 15: 24-34.
75. Kaplan B. Objectification and negotiation in interpreting clinical images: Implications for computer-based patient records. Artif Intell Med 1995; 7: 439-54.