A hedonic price function for forest land in Sweden

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 740-746

  Roos, Anders ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOREST MANAGEMENT; HEDONIC PRICE MODEL; LAND PRICE; MODELLING APPROACH; TIMBER PRODUCTION;

SWEDEN;

EID: 0029798448     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x26-083     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anonymous. 1991. Jordförvärvslagen (The Land Act). Stockholm. SFS 1991:670. [In Swedish.]
2. Barzel, Y. 1982. Measurement cost and the organization of markets. J. Law Econ. 25: 27-48.
3. Cassel, E., and Mendelsohn, R. 1985. The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: Comment. J. Urban Econ. 18: 135-142.
4. Chicoine, D.L. 1981. Farmland values at the urban fringe: an analysis of sale prices. Land Econ. 57(3): 353-362.
5. Cropper M.L., Deck L.B., and McConnell, K.E. 1988. On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 70(4): 668-675.
6. Dunford, R.W., Marti, C.E., and Mittelhammer, R.C. 1985. A case study of rural land prices at the urban fringe including subjective buyer expectations. Land Econ. 61(1): 10-28.
7. Frohm, S. 1988. Objektstorlekens inverkan på kostnaderna for drivning och markberedning. Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten Spånga. Sept. 1988. [In Swedish.]
8. Halvorsen, R., and Pollakowski, H.O. 1981. Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. J. Urban Econ. 10: 37-49.
9. Johansson, P.-O., and Löfgren, K.-G. 1985. The economics of forestry and natural resources. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
10. Kmenta, O. 1990. Elements of econometrics. Macmillan, New York.
11. Löfgren, C. 1990. Finns del stordriftsfördelar vid självverksamhet? En pilotstudie om arealens betydelse för de självversamma skogsägarnas avverkningskostnader. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Economics, Umeå. Rep. 93. [In Swedish.]
12. National Board of Forestry. 1994. Skoglig statistikinformation. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping. Rep. 1994:13. [In Swedish.]
13. National Board of Forestry and Official Statistics of Sweden. 1993. Statistical yearbook of forestry 1993. National Board of Forestry, Jönköping.
14. Palmquist, R. 1989. Land as a differentiated factor of production: a hedonic model and its implications for welfare measurement. Land Econ. 65(1): 23-28.
15. Parsons, G. 1990. Hedonic prices and public goods: an argument for weighting locational attributes in hedonic regressions. J. Urban Econ. 18: 135-142.
16. Roos, A. 1995. The price for forest land on combined forest estates. Scand. J. For. Res. 10: 204-208.
17. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 82: 34-55.
18. Shonkwiler, J.S., and Reynolds, J.E. 1986. A note on the use of land prices at the urban fringe. Land Econ. 62(1): 58-63.
19. Turner, R., Newton, C.M., and Dennis, D.F. 1991. Economic relationships between parcel characteristics and price in the market for Vermont forestland. For. Sci. 37(4): 1150-1162.
20. Willis, K.G., and Garrod, G.D. 1992. Amenity value of forests in Great Britain and its impact on the internal rate of return from forestry. Forestry, 65(3): 331-346.