Cytoskeleton and egg polarity;Cytosquelette et polarite ovulaire

Medecine/Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1145-1158

  Denis, Herman ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL TYPE; CENTROSOME; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; EGG; EVOLUTION; GERM LINE; METAZOON; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; SOMATIC CELL;

ANIMALIA; METAZOA;

EID: 0029797918     PISSN: 07670974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4267/10608/640     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Buss LW. The evolution of individuality. Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1987.
2. Davidson EH. Gene activity in early development. Orlando: Academic Press, 1986.
3. Holland LZ, Holland ND. Early development in the lancelet (= Amphioxus) Branchiostoma floridae from sperm entry through pronuclear fusion : presence of vegetal pole plasm and lack of conspicuous ooplasmic segregation. Biol Bull 1992 ; 182: 77-96.
4. Raven CP. Oogenesis. Oxford : Pereamon, 1961.
5. Hyman LH. The Invertebrates : Protozoa through Ctenophora. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1940.
6. Anderson DT. Embryology and phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1973.
7. Kimble J. An ancient molecular mechanism for establishing embryonic polarity? Science 1994; 266: 577-8.
8. Huxley JS, de Beer MA. The elements of experimental embryology. Londres: Cambridge University Press, 1934.
9. Bounoure L. La lignée germinale chez les batraciens anoures. In: Wolff E, ed. L'origine de la lignée germinale. Paris: Hermann, 1964: 205-34.
10. Gilbert SF. Developmental biology. Sunderland: Sinauer, 1994.
11. Holwill S, Heasman J, Crawley CR, Wylie CC. Axis and germ line deficiencies caused by u.v. irradiation of Xenopus oocytes cultured in vitro. Development 1987; 100: 735-43.
12. Denis H, Collenot A. L'origine et l'évolution de la reproduction sexuée, médecine/sciences 1993; 9: 1392-403.
13. Carré D, Rouvière C, Sardet C. In vitro fertilization in Ctenophores: sperm entry, mitosis and the establishment of bilateral symmetry in Beroe ovata. Dev Biol 1991; 147: 381-91.
14. Goldstein B, Hird SN. Specification of the anteroposterior axis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 1996 ; 122: 1467-74.
15. White J, Strome S. Cleavage plane specification in C. elegans: how to divide the spoils. Cell 1996; 84: 195-8.
16. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Watson JD. Biologie moléculaire de la cellule. Paris : Flammarion, 1990.
17. Zheng Y, Wong ML, Alberts A, Mitchison T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a γ-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 1995 ; 378: 578-83.
18. Bloom GS. Motor proteins for cytoplasmic microtubules. Curr Op Cell Biol 1992; 4: 66-73.
19. Wilhelm JE, Vale RD. RNA on the move: the mRNA localization pathway. J Cell Biol 1993; 123: 269-74.
20. Matsudaira P. Modular organization of actin crosslinking proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1991 ; 16: 87-92.
21. Denis H, Lacroix JC. Une interprétation évolutive de la gamétogenèse animale. médecine/sciences 1993; 9: 752-61.
22. Callen JC, Dennebouy N, Mounolou JC. Kinetic analysis of entire oogenesis in Xenopus laevis. Dev Growth Differ 1980 ; 22: 831-40.
23. Gard DL. Organization, nucleation, and acetylation of microtubules in Xenopus laevis oocytes: a study by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Dev Biol 1991; 143: 346-62.
24. Klymkowsky M, Karnovsky A. Morphogenesis and the cytoskeleton: studies of the Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 1994; 165: 372-84.
25. Guraya S. Recent advances in the morphology, cytochemistry, and function of Balbiani's vitelline body in animal oocytes. Int Rev Cytol 1979 ; 59 : 249-321.
26. Gard DL, Affleck D, Error BM. Microtubule organization, acetylation, and nucleation in Xenopus laevis oocytes: II. A developmental transition in microtubule organization during early diplotene. Dev Biol 1995; 168: 189-201.
27. Callen JC. Differential pinocytosis and the origin of the animal-vegetal polarity in Xenopus laevis oocytes of growing or post-spawning adult females. Biol Cell 1986; 57: 207-20.
28. Byrne BM, Gruber M, Ab G. The evolution of egg yolk proteins. Prog Biophys Molec Biol 1989; 53: 33-69.
29. Stifani S, Nimpf J, Schneider WJ. Vitello-genesis in Xenopus laevis and chicken : cognate ligands and oocyte receptors. J Biol Chem 1990 ; 265: 882-8.
30. Bujo H, Hermann M, Kaderli MO, Jacobsen L, Sugawara S, Nimpf J, Yamamoto T, Schneider WJ. Chicken oocyte growth is mediated by an eight ligand binding repeat member of the LDL receptor family. EMBO J 1994 ; 13: 5165-75.
31. Fagotto F, Maxfield FR. Yolk platelets in Xenopus oocytes maintain an acidic internal pH which may be essential for sodium accumulation. J Cell Biol 1994; 125: 1047-56.
32. Retlek H, Steyrer E, Sanders EJ, Nimpf J, Schneider WJ. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of chicken cathepsin D, a key enzyme for yolk formation. DNA Cell Biol 1992; 11 : 661-72.
33. Ding D, Lipshitz HD. Localized RNAs and their functions. BioEssays 1993 ; 15: 651-8.
34. Forristall C, Pondel M, Chen L, King ML. Patterns of localization and cytoskeletal association of two vegetally localized RNAs, Vg1 and Xcat-2. Development 1995; 121: 201-8.
35. Kloc M, Etkin LD. Two distinct pathways for the localization of RNAs at the vegetal cortex in Xenopus oocytes. Development 1995; 121: 287-97.
36. Ysraeli JK, Sokol S, Melton DA. A two-step model for the localization of maternal mRNA in Xenopus oocytes: involvement of microtubules and microfilaments in the translocation and anchoring of Vg1 mRNA. Development 1990; 108: 289-98.
37. Kloc M, Etkin LD. Delocalization of Vg1 mRNA from the vegetal cortex in Xenopus oocytes after destruction of Xlsirt RNA. Science 1994; 265: 1101-3.
38. Child CM. Patterns and problems of development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941.
39. Denburg AF, Sedat JW, Cande WZ, Bass HW. Cytology of telomeres. In: Blackburn EH, Greider CW, eds. Telomeres. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor University Press, 1995: 295-338.
40. Theurkauf WE. Microtubules and cytoplasm organization during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol 1994; 165: 352-60.
41. Mahajan-Miklos S, Cooley L. Intercellular cytoplasm transport during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol 1994; 165: 336-51.
42. Cooley L, Theurkauf WE. Cytoskeletal functions during Drosophila oogenesis. Science 1994; 266: 590-6.
43. Micklem DR. mRNA localization during development. Dev Biol 1995 ; 172: 377-95.
44. Rongo C, Lehmann R. Regulated synthesis, transport and assembly of the Drosophila germ plasm. Trends Genet 1996; 12: 102-9.
45. Gonzalez-Reyes A, St Johnston D. Role of oocyte position in establishment of anterior-posterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 1994; 266: 639-42.
46. Schweisguth F, Israël A. Signalisation intracellulaire par le récepteur Notch. Conservation de la drosophile aux mammifères, médecine/sciences 1996; 12: 155-63.
47. Strome S. The germ of the issue. Nature 1992; 358: 368-9.
48. St Johnston D, Nüsslein-Volhard C. The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 1992 ; 68 : 201-19.
49. Wilson JE, Macdonald PM. Formation of germ cells in Drosophila. Curr Op Genet Dev 1993; 3: 562-5.
50. St Johnston D. The intracellular localization of messenger RNAs. Cell 1995 ; 81 : 161-70.
51. Tetzlaff MT, Jäckel H, Pankratz MJ. Lack of Drosophila cytoskeletal tropomyosin affects head morphogenesis and the accumulation of oskar mRNA required for germ cell formation. EMBO J 1996; 15: 1247-54.
52. Condamine H. L'induction mésodermique et la dorsalisation de l'embryon d'amphibien. médecine/sciences 1992; 8 : 379-81.
53. Eaton S, Simons K. Apical, basal, and lateral cues for epithelial organization. Cell 1995; 82: 5-8.
54. Denis H, Mignot JP. L'origine des métazoaires. médecine/sciences 1994; 10: 551-63.
55. Dubreuil RR. Structure and evolution of the actin crosslinking proteins. BioEssays 1991 ; 13: 219-26.