Hemodynamic effects in acute cardiomyoplasty of different wrapped muscle activation times as measured by pressure-volume relations

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 217-225

  Lorusso, Roberto ^a,b   Van Der Veen, Frederik ^a   Schreuder, Jan J ^a   Bolotin, Gil ^a   Kaulbach, Hans G ^a   Frietman, Robert ^a   Habets, Jo ^a   Van Der Nagel, Theo ^a   Wellens, Hein J ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Ospedale Civile   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CARDIOMYOPLASTY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GOAT; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART PERFORMANCE; LATISSIMUS DORSI FLAP; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE VOLUME CURVE; SYSTOLE;

EID: 0029796712     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1996.tb00042.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Carpentier A, Chachques JC: Myocardial substitution with a stimulated skeletal muscle: First successful clinical case. (Letter) Lancet 1981: 1267.
2. Chachques JC, Grandjean PA, Schwartz K, et al: Effect of latissimus dorsi dynamic cardiomyoplasty on ventricular function. Circulation 1988; 78(Suppl III):203-216.
3. Helou J, Misawa Y, Stewart JA, et al: Optimizing "delay period" for burst stimulation in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:74-77.
4. Grubb NR, Campanella C, Sutherland GR, et al: Optimizing muscle synchronization after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:45-49.
5. Schreuder JJ, van der Veen FH, van der Velde ET, et al: Beat-to-beat analysis of left ventricular pressure-volume relation and stroke volume by conductance catheter and aortic modelflow in cardiomyoplasty patients. Circulation 1995;91: 2010-2017.
6. Costanzo MR, Augustine S, Bourge R, et al: Selection and treatment of candidates for heart transplantation. Circulation 1995;92:3593-3612.
7. Lange R, Sack FU, Voss B, et al: Treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy with dynamic cardiomyoplasty: The Heidelberg experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1219-1225.
8. Lorusso R, Sandrelli L, Volterrani M, et al: Cardiomyoplasty as isolated procedure to treat refractory heart failure. 9th Annual Meeting, The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Paris 1995 (Proceedings).
9. Moreira LFP, Stolf NAG, Bocchi EA, et al: Clinical and left ventricular function outcomes up to five years after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:353-363.
10. Jegaden O, Delahaye F, Finet G, et al: Late hemodynamic results after cardiomyoplasty in congestive heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57:1151-1157.
11. Carpentier A, Chachques JC, Acar C, et al: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty at seven years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106 :42-54.
12. el Okley RM, Jarvis JC: Cardiomyoplasty: A critical review of experimental and clinical results. Circulation 1994;90:2085-2090.
13. Molteni L, Almada H, Ferreira R, et al: Assessment of the optimal time interval between QRS and single pulse stimulation in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. In Chiu RCI, Bourgeois IM (eds): Transformed Muscle for Cardiac Assist and Repair. Mount Kisko, NY, Futura Publishing Co. Inc.,;1990, pp. 188-196.
14. Geddes LA, Janas W, Bourland JD, et al: The importance of timing muscle contraction in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. PACE 1993;5:2255-2265.
15. Nakajima H, Niinami H, Hooper TL, et al: Cardiomyoplasty: Probable mechanism of effectiveness using the pressure/volume relationship. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:407-415.
16. Corin WJ, George DT, Sink JD, et al: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty acutely impairs left ventricular diastolic function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1662-1671.
17. Hagège AA, Desnos M, Fernandez F, et al: Clinical study of the effects of latissimus dorsi muscle flap stimulation after cardiomyoplasty. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl II):210-215.
18. Jondeau G, Dorent R, Bors V, et al: Dynamic cardiomyoplasty: Effect of discontinuing latissimus dorsi muscle stimulation on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance and exercise capacity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:129-134.
19. Lucas CMBH, van der Veen FH, Cheriex EC, et al: The importance of muscle relaxation in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. PACE 1992;15:1430-1436.
20. Pekarsky VV, Akhmedov SD, Dubrovsky IA, et al: Optimal electrical stimulation for latissimus dorsi muscle after cardiomyoplasty. J Card Surg 1993;8:172-176.
21. Lucas CMHB, van der Veen FH, Cheriex EC, et al: Long-term follow-up (12 to 35 weeks) after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:758-767.
22. Kalil-Filho R, Bocchi E, Weiss RG, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of chronic changes in latissimus dorsi cardiomyoplasty. Circulation 1994;90(Suppl II):102-106.
23. Almada H, Molteni L, Ferrera R, et al: The value of the echo-doppler in cardiomyoplasty procedures. J Card Surg 1991 ;6(Suppl):113-118.