The relative diagnostic impact of screening mammography and physical examination

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 257-259

  Taves, Donald H ^a   McCurdy, Lauren I ^a   Sparrow, R Keith ^b  

^a ST JOSEPH S HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

breast cancer; breast screening; mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; COST CONTROL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; ONTARIO; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0029794746     PISSN: 00082902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. VanDerMass PJ, DeKoning HJ, VanIneveld BM, VanOortmarssen GJ, Habbema JDF, Lubbe KTNL, et al. The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Int J Cancer 1989;43:1055-1060.
2. Tabar L. Control of breast cancer through screening mammography. Radiology 1990;174(3):655-656.
3. Day NE, Baines CJ, Chamberlain J, Hakama M, Miller AB, Prorok P. UICC project on screening for cancer: report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1986;38:303-308.
4. Rutqvist LE, Miller AB, Andersson I, Hakama M, Hakulinen T. Sigfusson BF, et al. Reduced breastcancer mortality with mammography screening -an assessment of currently available data. Int J Cancer 1990;suppl 5:76-84.
5. Burhenne LJW, Hislop TG, Burhenne HJ. The British Columbia mammography screening program: evaluation of the first 15 months. AfR 1992;158:45-49.
6. Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. Can Med Assoc J 1992;147(10):1477-1488.
7. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, Landberg T, Lindholm K, Linell F, et al: Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ 1988;297:943-948.
8. Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85(2):1644-1656.
9. Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Ryden S, et al: Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 1993;341(8851):973-978.
10. Reynolds T. British trial aims to settle mammography questions. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:338-341.
11. Bird RE. Low-cost screening mammography: report on finances and review of 21,716 consecutive cases. Radiology 1989;171:87-90.
12. Bird RE, McClelland R. How to initiate and operate a low-cost screening mammography center. Radiology 1986;161:43-47.
13. Lynde JL. A community program of low-cost screening mammography: the results of 21,141 consecutive examinations. South Med J 1993; 86:338-343.
14. Clay MG, Hislop TG, Kan L, Oliveotto IA, Burhenne LJ. Screening mammography in British Columbia 1988-1993. Am J Surg 1994;167(5):490-492.
15. Bassett LW, Liu TH, Giuliano AE, Gold RH. The prevalence of carcinoma in palpable vs. impalpable mammographically detected lesions. AJR 1991;157(1):21-24.
16. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989; 63:181-187.
17. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. RadiolOgy 1992;184:613-617.
18. Ciatto S, Cataliotti L, Distante V. Nonpalpable lesions detected with mammography: review of 512 consecutive cases. Radiology 1987;165: 99-102.