Final clarification by integrated filtration within the activated sludge aeration tank

Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1007-1014

  Zaloum, R ^a   Coron Ramstrim A F ^a   Gehr, R ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activated sludge; Filtration; Membrane bioreactor

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BATCH REACTORS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; DAIRIES; EFFICIENCY; EFFLUENTS; FILTRATION; MICROFILTRATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; FILTRATION EFFICIENCY; FINAL CLARIFICATIONS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; OVERALL EFFICIENCY; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SOLIDS CONCENTRATIONS; STEADY-STATE CONDITION;

CLARIFICATION;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CHEESE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FILTRATION; FOOD PROCESSING; LABORATORY; PERMEABILITY; SLUDGE CLARIFICATION; STEADY STATE; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0029794280     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593331708616469     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Peavy H.S., Rowe D.R. and Tchobanoglous G., Environmental Engineering, McGraw Hill, New York, (1985).
2. Zaloum R., Lessard S., Mourato D. and Carriere J., Membrane bioreactor treatment of oily wastes. Proceedings of the Joint CSCE-ASCE Conference on Environmental Engineering, 1033-1040, Montreal, July 1993.
3. Logan B.E., Hilbert T. A. and Arnold R.G., Removal of bacteria in laboratory filters: models and experiments. Wat. Res., 27, 6, 955-962, (1993).
4. Abulnour A.G., Talaat H.A., Sorour M.H. and Tewfik S.R., Parametric evaluation of flux decline during ultrafiltration of proteins solutions. Desalination, 68, 35-44, (1988).
5. Devereux N., Hoare M. and Dunnill P., Membrane separation of protein precipitates: unstirred batch studies. Biotech. and Bioeng28, 88-96, (1986).
6. Smith, Jr. Ç.V., Gregorio D.D and Talcott R.M., The use of ultrafiltration membrane for activated sludge separation. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, (1969).
7. Krauth K.H. and Staab K.F., Substitution.of the final clarifier by membrane filtration within the activated sludge process with increased pressure; initial findings. Desalination, 68,179-189, (1988).
8. Krauth K.H. and Staab K.F., Pressurized bioreactor with membrane filtration for wastewater treatment. Wat. Res., 27, 3, 405-411, (1993).
9. Chaize S. and Huyard A., Membrane bioreactor on domestic wastewater treatment, sludge production and modelling approach. Wat. Sei. Tech., 23,1591-1600, (1991).
10. Sato T. and Ishii Y., Effects of activated sludge properties on water flux of ultrafiltration membrane used for human excrement treatment. Wat. Sei. Tech., 23, 1601-1608, (1991).
11. Kolega M., Grohmann G S., Chiew R.F. and Day, A. W., Disinfection and clarification of treated sewage by advanced microfiltration. Wat. Sei Tech., 23,1609-1618, (1991).
12. Gosling P. and Brown D., Membranes for sewage treatment: the reality. Wat. Sei. Tech., 27,5-6,439-447, (1993).
13. Hodgson P.H. and Fane A.G., Crossflow microfiltration of biomass with inorganic membranes: the influence of membrane surface and fluid dynamics. Key Eng. Materials, 61-62,167-174, (1992).
14. Bruus J.H., Nielsen P.H. and Keiding K., On the stability of activated sludge floes with implications to dewatering. Wat. Res., 26,12,1597-1604, (1992).
15. Metcalf and Eddy, inc., Wastewater Engineering. Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse, 3rd edition, Chap. 11, McGraw Hill, New York, (1991).
16. AWWA-APHA-WPCF., Standard Methods for the Examination of Waters and Wastes, 17th edition, American Public Health Association, New York, (1989).
17. Hale F.D. and Carver S.R., Viscous bulking of activated sludge. Presented at the 5th Annual Conf. of the Wat. Pollut. Control. Fed., Atlanta, Ga, Oct. 2-7, (1983).
18. Forster C.F., Activated sludge surfaces in relation to the sludge volume index. Wat. Res., 5, 861-870, (1971).
19. Zaloum R. and Lamarche A., Practical application of statistics for the monitoring and interpretation of waste treatment process performance. Environ. Technol., 13,1-9, (1992).