Scientific publications from departments of clinical physiology and nuclear medicine in Denmark. A bibliometric analysis of 'impact' in the years 1989-1994

Clinical Physiology

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 507-519

  Hansen, H B ^a   Brinch, K ^a   Henriksen, J H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b HVIDOVRE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Clinical physiology; Impact factor; Nuclear medicine; Research evaluation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENMARK; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; TIME;

EID: 0029793671     PISSN: 01445979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.1996.tb01016.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BRAUN D. (1994) Structure and dynamics of health research and public funding. An international institutional comparison. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. COLE S., COLE J. R. & SIMON G. A. (1981) Chance and consensus in peer review. Science, 214, 881-886.
3. ELDOR J. (1993) Geography of medical publication. Lancet, 341, 634.
4. GARFIELD E. (1972) Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
5. GARFIELD E. (1989) SCI Journal Citation Reports. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.
6. GARFIELD E. (1993) SCI Journal Citation Reports. Institute for Scientific Information, Philadelphia.
7. GØTZSCHE P. C., KROG J. W. & MOUSTGAARD R. (1995) Bibliometric analysis of Danish medical research 1988-1992. Ugeskr Lœg, 157, 5075-5081.
8. JUDSON H. F. (1994) Structural transformations of the sciences and the end of peer review. JAMA, 272, 92-94.
9. KASSIRER J. P. & CAMPION E. W. (1994) Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indespensable. JAMA, 272, 96-97.
10. LOCK S. (1994) Does editorial peer review work? Ann Int Med, 121, 60-61.
11. OECD (1994) The measurement of scientific and technical activities. Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experimental development. In: Frascati manual, (eds N. Tanaka & G. Sirilli), pp. 135-136. OECD, Paris.
12. OLSEN T. B., HANSEN H. F., LUUKKONEN T., PERSSON O. & SIVERTSEN G. (1994) Nordisk forskning i international sammenhæng - en bibliometrisk beskrivelse av publisering og siteringer i naturvitenskapelig og medisinsk forskning. Tema Nord, 618, 1-56.
13. ROCHON P. A., GURWITZ J. H., CHEUNG C.M, HAYES J. A. & CHALMERS T. C. (1994) Evaluating the quality of articles published in supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal. JAMA, 272, 108-113.
14. ROY R., ROY N. R. & JOHNSON C. G. (1983) Approximating total citation counts from first author counts and from total papers. Scientometrics, 5, 117-124.
15. SEGLEN P. O. (1992) The skewness of science. J Am Soc Inf Sci, 43, 628-638.
16. SEGLEN P. O. (1994) Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. J Am Soc Inf Sci, 45, 1-11.
17. SMITH R. (1994) Promoting research into peer review. An invitation to join in. Brit Med J, 309, 143-144.
18. The Danish Council for Research Policy (1993) International evaluation of Danish health research. Conclusions and recommendations. The Danish Council for Research Policy, Copenhagen.