메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 567-573

Workshop on phase I study design. Ninth NCI/EORTC New Drug Development Symposium, Amsterdam, March 12, 1996

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

EID: 0029793053     PISSN: 09237534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010672     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (61)

References (8)
  • 1
    • 1942502957 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Starting dose levels for phase I studies
    • Verweij J. Starting dose levels for phase I studies Proceedings of the 9th NCI-EORTC Symposium on New Drugs in Cancer Therapy, Amsterdam 1996 13 March 12–15, (Abstr)
    • (1996) , pp. 13
    • Verweij, J.1
  • 2
    • 84884118507 scopus 로고
    • Evaluation of preclinical toxicity models for phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs: The NCI experience (1983–1992)
    • Smith A.C. Rubinstein L. Koutsoukos A. Evaluation of preclinical toxicity models for phase I clinical trials of anticancer drugs: The NCI experience (1983–1992) Proc AACR 35 1994 459 (Abstr)
    • (1994) Proc AACR , vol.35 , pp. 459
    • Smith, A.C.1    Rubinstein, L.2    Koutsoukos, A.3
  • 5
    • 0003042817 scopus 로고
    • Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in the chemotherapy setting
    • Blackwell S. Crawford J. Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in the chemotherapy setting Morstyn G. Dexter T.M. Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in Clinical Practice 1994 Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York 114
    • (1994) , pp. 114
    • Blackwell, S.1    Crawford, J.2
  • 6
    • 85114526441 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Phase I studies - alternative endpoints: When is toxicity not appropriate?
    • Steward W.P. Phase I studies - alternative endpoints: When is toxicity not appropriate? Proceedings of the 9th NCI-EORTC Symposium on New Drugs in Cancer Therapy, Amsterdam 1996 13 March 12–15, (Abstr)
    • (1996) , pp. 13
    • Steward, W.P.1
  • 7
    • 85114526212 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dose escalation schemes: Are alternatives to Fibonacci useful?
    • Christian M.C. Dose escalation schemes: Are alternatives to Fibonacci useful? Proceedings of the 9th NCI-EORTC Symposium on New Drugs in Cancer Therapy, Amsterdam 1996 13 March 12–15, (Abstr)
    • (1996) , pp. 13
    • Christian, M.C.1
  • 8
    • 85114543577 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is response in phase I trials a useful predictor for the future clinical activity of a new agent?
    • Von Hoff D. Is response in phase I trials a useful predictor for the future clinical activity of a new agent? Proceedings of the 9th NCI-EORTC Symposium on New Drugs in Cancer Therapy, Amsterdam 1996 14 March 12–15, (Abstr)
    • (1996) , pp. 14
    • Von Hoff, D.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.