Prognostic value of the monoethylglycinexylidide liver function test in assessing donor liver suitability

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1099-1102

  Fairchild, Ralph ^a,b   Solomon, Harvey ^a   Contis, John ^a   Kaminski, Donald ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEETHYLLIDOCAINE;

ARTICLE; DRUG METABOLISM; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER FUNCTION TEST; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0029792982     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430220093022     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Pruim J, van Woerden WF, Knol E, et al. Donor data in liver grafts with primary non-function: a preliminary analysis by the European Liver Registry. Transplant Proc. 1989;21:2383-2384.
2. Adam R, Azoulay D, Astarcioglu I, et al. Reliability of the MEGX test in the selection of liver grafts. Transplant Proc. 1991;23:2470-2471.
3. Burdelski M, Oellerich M, Lamesch P, et al. Evaluation of quantitative liver function tests in liver donors. Transplant Proc. 1987;19:3838-3839.
4. Keenaghan JB, Boyes RN. The tissue distribution, metabolism, and excretion of lidocaine in rats, guinea pigs, dogs and man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1972; 180:454-463.
5. Piper JA, Rodman JH. Lidocaine. In: Evans WE, Schentag JJ, Jusko WJ, eds. Applied Pharmacokinetics. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co Inc; 1986: 630-681.
6. Colli A, Buccino G, Cocciolo M, Paravicini R, Scaltrini G. Dispositon of a flowlimited drug (lidocaine) and a metabolic capacity-limited drug (theophylline) in liver cirrhosis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;44:642-649.
7. Oellerich M, Raude E, Burdelski M, et al. Mono-ethylglycinexylidine formation kinetics: a novel approach to assessment of liver function. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1987;25:845-853.
8. Shiffman ML, Luketic VA, Sanyal AJ, et al. Hepatic lidocaine metabolism and liver histology in patients with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1993; 19:933-940.
9. Arrigoni A, Gindro T, Aimo G, et al. Monoethylglicinexylidide test: a prognostic indicator of survival in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1994;20:383-387.
10. Oellerich M, Burdelski M, Ringe B, et al. Lignocaine metabolite formation as a measure of pre-transplant liver function. Lancet. 1989;1:640-642.
11. Reding R, Wallemacq P, de Ville de Goyet J, et al. The unreliability of the lidocaine/ monoethylglycinxylidide test for assessment of liver donors. Transplantation. 1993;56:323-326.
12. Potter JM, Hickman PE, Balderson G, Lynch SV, Strong R. Lignocaine metabolism and MEGX production in the liver transplant donor. Transplant Proc. 1992;24:198-199.
13. Makowka L, Gordon RD, Todo S, et al. Analysis of donor criteria for the prediction of outcome in clinical liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1987;19: 2378-2382.
14. Marino IG, Doyle HR, Aldrighetti L, et al. Effect of donor age and sex on the outcome of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1995;22:1754-1762.
15. D-Alessandro A, Kalayoglu M, Sollinger H, et al. The predictive value of donor liver biopsies for the development of primary nonfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1991;51:157-163.
16. Li AP, Rasmussen A, Xu L, Kaminski DL. Rifampicin induction of lidocaine metabolism in cultured human hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274: 673-677.
17. Abdel-Razzak Z, Loyer P, Fautrel A, et al. Cytokines down-regulate expression of major cytochrome P 450 enzymes in adult human hepatocytes in primary culture. Mol Pharmacol. 1993;44:707-715.
18. Muntane-Relat J, Ourlin J, Domergue J, Maurel P. Differential effects of cytokines on the inducible expression of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP3A4 in human hepatocytes in primary culture. Hepatology. 1995;22:1143-1153.
19. Hunt CM, Westerkam WR, Stave GM. Effect of age and gender on the activity of human hepatic CYP3A. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;44:275-283.