WHO and the effects of extrabudgetary funds: Is the Organization donor driven?

Health Policy and Planning

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 253-264

  Vaughan, J Patrick ^a   Møgedal, Sigrun ^b,e   Walt, Gill ^c   Kruse, Stein Erik ^b,e,f,g,h   Lee, Kelley ^c   De Wilde, Koen ^d,f  

^a INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DIARRHOEAL DISEASE RESEARCH   (Bangladesh)

^b Diakonhjemmets International Centre   (Norway)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL TROPICAL INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^e DiS   (Norway)

^f LSHTM ^*

^g Norwegian NGOs   (Norway)

^h UNICEF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; REVIEW; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0029790531     PISSN: 02681080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/heapol/11.3.253     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Childers E, Urqhart B. 1994. Renewing the United Nations system. Development Dialogue 1: 1-214.
2. COWIconsult. 1991. Effectiveness of Multilateral Agencies at Country Level: WHO in Kenya, Nepal, Sudan and Thailand. Copenhagen: DANIDA, Ministry of Foreign Affairs; p. 54.
3. Deas EA, Daoudy A. 1993. Decentralization of Organizations within the United Nations System, Part III: The World Health Organization. Geneva: UN Joint Inspection Unit; p. 47.
4. Godlee F. 1994-1995. WHO in crisis. [series of eight articles] British Medical Journal 309: 1424-8, 1491-5, 1566-70 and 1646-70;
5. Godlee F. British Medical Journal 310: 110-2, 178-82, 389-93 and 583-6.
6. Kickbusch I. 1995. World Health Organization: Changes and process. British Medical Journal 310: 1518-20.
7. Lancet Editorial. 1994. Fortress WHO. Lancet 345: 203-4.
8. Peabody JW. 1995. An organizational analysis of the World Health Organization: narrowing the gap between promise and performance. Social Science and Medicine 40: 731-42.
9. Stenson B, Sterky G. 1994. What future WHO? Health Policy 28: 235-56.
10. Vaughan JP, Mogedal S, Kruse S-K, Lee K, Walt G, de Wilde K. 1995. Cooperation for Health Development: Extrabudgetary funds in the World Health Organisation. Report published by the Governments of Australia (AusAID), Norway (NORAD) and the United Kingdom (ODA). London: Overseas Development Administration.
11. Vaughan JP, Mogedal S, Kruse S-K, Lee K, Walt G, de Wilde K. 1996a. Supporting the World Health Organisation: the importance of extrabudgetary funds. World Health Forum (submitted for publication).
12. Vaughan JP, Mogedal S, Kruse S-K, Lee K, Walt G, de Wilde K. 1996b. Financing the World Health Organisation: global importance of extrabudgetary funds. Health Policy (forthcoming).
13. Walt G. 1993. WHO under stress: implications for health policy. Health Policy 24: 125-44.
14. World Health Organization. 1975. Organizational Study on the Planning for and Impact of Extrabudgetary Resources on WHO's Programmes and Policy. Geneva: WHO EB/57/25; pp. 65-95.
15. World Health Organization. 1992. Proposed Programme Budget for the Financial Period 1994-1995. Geneva: WHO Document PB/94-95.
16. World Health Organization. 1993. Report of the Executive Board Working Group on the WHO Response to Global Change. Geneva: WHO EB92/4; p. 13.
17. World Health Organization, 1994. Financial Report and Audited Financial Statements for the Period 1 January 1992-31 December 1993, and Report of the External Auditor to the World Health Assembly; And Annex: Extrabudgetary Resources for Programme Activities. Geneva: WHO A47/19 and Addendum 1.