A comparison of pathological methods of measuring lung cancer volume

Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 654-656

  Binks, S ^a   Clelland, C A ^a   Layton, C ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lung cancer volume

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 0029789117     PISSN: 00219746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.49.8.654     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Jackman RJ, Good CA, Clagett OT, Woolner LB. Survival rates in peripheral bronchogenic carcinomas up to four centimetres in diameter presenting as pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;57:1-8.
2. Steele JD, Kleitsch WP, Dunn JE Jr, Buell P. Survival in males with bronchogenic carcinomas resected as asymptomatic solitary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;2:368-76.
3. Steele JD, Buell P. Asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodules. Host survival, tumor size, and growth rate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1973;65:140-51.
4. American Joint Committee. Staging of lung cancer. Chicago: American Joint Committee for Cancer Staging and End Results Reporting, 1979.
5. Kerr KM, Lamb D. A comparison of patient survival and tumour growth kinetics in human bronchogenic carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1988;58:419-22.
6. Whitley NO, Belani CP, Aisner J, Forrest A, Whitley J. Tumour volume and treatment outcome in small cell lung carcinomas. Invest Radiol 1989;24:581-4.
7. Dunnill MS, Ahere WA. Morphometry. London: Edward Arnold, 1982.