Current use of pharmacy automation in the United States

Hospital Pharmacy

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 1093-1101

  Williams, J S ^a   Kelley, N William ^a   Ttjomas Grapes, Z ^b   Raymond, Joseph D ^c  

^a Mercer University School of Pharmacy   (United States)

^b Consolidated Mail out Program ^*  (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

automation; cost justification

Indexed keywords

COST; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; PHARMACY; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029787929     PISSN: 00185787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Williams SJ. Tools of the automation challenge. Computer Talk. 1994;14(6): 20-21.
2. Simmer TF, Stefen WM. Impact of a pharmacy and nursing service survey after a one month trial with We Pyxis Meditation. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting; 1993(28 Dec), p. 203(E).
3. Grapes ZT, Haymond JD, Stahl AA. Impact of an automated controlled substance system on pharmacy and nursing attitudes. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting; 1992(27 Dec), p. 10(E).
4. Eqbunike I, Maksym C.Wolk R, Khalidi N. Comparison of automated TPX compounding methods. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting; 1989(24 Dec), p. 150(E).
5. Banahan BE What are you doing with that computer? Computer Talk-Pharm. 1993 (Jan.-Feb.); 13:6-8.
6. Real ML, Banahan BF, Brown TR, Szeinbach SL. Computerized services in hospital pharmacy departments. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993;50:121-123.
7. Szeinbach SL, Banahan, BF. Measuring computer use in pharmacy today. PharmTimes. 1991;57:65-70.
8. Perini VJ, Vermeulen LC. Comparison of automated medication-management systems. Am J Hasp Pharm. 1994;51: 1883-1891.