Informed consent for medical research: Common discrepancies and readability

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 745-750

  White, Lynn J ^a   Jones, Jeffrey S ^b,d   Felton, Christopher W ^a   Pool, Linda C ^c  

^a AKRON GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SPECTRUM HEALTH   (United States)

^c Cook Res and Education Institute ^*  (United States)

^d Department of Emergency Medicine ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

clinical research; informed consent; institutional review board; readability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

EID: 0029786155     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1996.tb03509.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Department of Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46 - Protection of Human Subjects. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992, pp 1-17.
2. Murgatroyd RJ, Cooper RM. Readability of informed consent forms. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991; 48:2651-2.
3. Grunder TM. Informed consent: a tutorial. Owings Mills, MD: National Health Publishing, 1986, pp 228-31.
4. White LJ, Jones JS, Faflik RJ, Pool LC, Dougherty JM. Getting along with your IRB: a national survey of institutional review boards [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med. 1995; 2:383.
5. Tarnowski KJ, Allen DM, Mayhall C, Kelly PA. Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. Pediatrics. 1990; 85:58-62.
6. Baker MT, Taub HA. Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center. JAMA. 1983; 250:2546-8.
7. Morrow GR. How readable are subject informed consent forms? JAMA. 1980; 244:56-8.
8. Spivey WH. Informed consent for clinical research in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18:766-71.
9. Powers RD. Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials. Ann Emerg Med. 1988; 17: 124-6.
10. Hammerschmidt DE, Keane MA. Institutional review board (IRB) review lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research. Am J Med Sci. 1992; 304:348-51.
11. Goldman J. Inconsistency and institutional review boards. JAMA. 1982; 248:197-202.
12. Meslin EM, Lavery JV, Sutherland HJ, Till JE. Judging the ethical merit of clinical trials: what criteria do research ethics boards use? IRB Rev Hum Subjects Res. 1994; 16:6-10.
13. Microsoft Word for Windows (TM) User's Guide, Word Processing Program, Version 2.0. Redmond, WA, Microsoft Corporation, 1991, pp 290-1.
14. Glinsky AS. How valid is the Flesch readability formula? Am Psychol. 1948; 3:261.
15. Klare GR. The Measurement of Readability. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1963.
16. Flesch R. The Art of Readable Writing. New York: Harper & Row, 1984.
17. Hopper KD, Lambe HA, Shirk SJ. Readability of informed consent forms for use with iodinated contrast media. Radiology. 1993; 187:279-83.
18. Grander TM. On the readability of surgical consent forms. N Engl J Med. 1980; 302:900-2.
19. Meade CD, Howser DM. Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992; 19:1523-8.
20. Bosso JA. The role of the institutional review board in research involving human subjects. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983; 17: 828-34.
21. Boisaubin EV, Dresser R. Informed consent in emergency care: illusion and reform. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16:62-7.
22. Maxwell M. Readability: have we gone too far? J Reading. 1978: 22:525-9.
23. Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America: A First Look at the Results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Princeton, NJ: U.S. Department of Education, Education Testing Service, 1993.
24. Jolly BT, Scott JL, Feied CF, Sanford SM. Functional illiteracy among emergency department patients: a preliminary study. Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22:575-8.
25. Jackson RH, Davis TC, Bairnsfather LE, George RB, Crouch MA, Gault H. Patient reading ability: an overlooked problem in health care. South Med J. 1991; 84:1172-5.
26. Silva MC, Sorrell JM. Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research. IRB Rev Hum Subjects Res. 1988; 10:1-5.