Should intellectual property be disseminated by 'forwarding' rejected letters without permission?

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 243-246

  Gupta, Vinod Kumar ^a  

^a Dubai eGovernment Dubai Police   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Copyright violation; Ethics; Forwarding of rejected letters; Scientific letter writing; Scientific review

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HUMAN; LETTER; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0029780442     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.4.243     Document Type: Short Survey

References (13)

1. Dewey ME. Authors have rights too. British Medical Journal 1993; 306: 318-20.
2. Skrabanek P, The ethics and politics of human experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
3. Gillett R, Harrow J. Is medical research well served by peer review British Medical Journal 1993; 306: 1672-5.
4. Smith R. Questioning academic integrity. British Medical Journal 1994; 309: 1597-8.
5. Bhopal RS, Tonks A. The role of letters in reviewing research. British Medical Journal 1994; 308: 1582-3.
6. Crosson FJ. Science and literature. Science and contemporary society. Cochin: Palco Publishing House, 1967.
7. Anonymous [editorial]. US science policy: what science, whose policy? Lancet 1994; 343: 367-8.
8. Gupta VK Menstrual migraine is not pathogenetically related to premenstrual syndrome. Cephalalgia 1994; 14: 411-2.
9. Rennie D. Editors and authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 1989; 261: 2543-5.
10. Anonymous [editorial]. On the falsification of ideas, Lancet 1992; 340: 344-5.
11. Orwell G. Nineteen eighty-four. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd, 1954.
12. Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. British Medical Journal 1994; 309: 184-8.
13. Bhopal RS, Parkin DW. Authors have rights too. British Medical Journal 1993; 306: 716-7.