A comparative analysis of signal processing methods for motion-based rate responsive pacing

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 1230-1247

  Greenhut, Saul E ^a   Shreve, Eric A ^a   Lau, Chu Pak ^b  

^a Telectronics Pacing Systems   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

accelerometer; activity; algorithm; filter; pacemaker; rate response

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0029778225     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb04194.x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Sulke AN, Pipilis A, Henderson RA. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity. Br Heart J 1990; 64:25-31.
2. Lau C-P, Butrous GS, Ward DE, et al. Comparison of exercise performance of six rate-adaptive right ventricular cardiac pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:833-838.
3. Connelly DT, The Topaz Study Group. Initial experience with a new single chamber, dual sensor rate responsive pacemaker. PACE 1993; 16:1833-1841.
4. Mianulli M, Benditt DG. Evaluation of a dual-sensor rate adaptive pacemaker with a standardized activities of daily living protocol - Results of a multicenter study, (abstract) PACE 1994; 17:804.
5. Anderson K, Humen D, Klein GJ, et al. A rate variable pacemaker which automatically adjusts for physical activity. (abstract) PACE 1983; 6:A-12.
6. Lau C-P, Tse W-S, Camm AJ. Clinical experience with Sensolog 703: A new activity sensing rate responsive pacemaker. PACE 1988; 11:1444-1455.
7. Alt E, Matula M. Comparison of two activity-controlled rate-adaptive pacing principles: Acceleration versus vibration. Cardiol Clin 1992; 10:635-658.
8. Zarling J, Belott P, Brown D, et al. A comparison of external rate responsive pacemakers with identical implanted units. PACE 1992; 15:1886-1889.
9. Bacharach DW, Hilden TS, Millerhagen JO, et al. Activity-based pacing: Comparison of a device using an accelerometer versus a piezoelectric crystal. PACE 1992; 15:188-196.
10. Lau C-P, Tai Y-T, Fong P-C, et al. Clinical experience with an activity sensing DDDR pacemaker using an accelerometer sensor. PACE 1992; 15:334-343.
11. Cooper D. Comparison of activity sensors and algorithms for rate-responsive pacemakers using ambulatory monitoring. IEEE Comp Cardiol 1993; 851-854.
12. Stangl K, Wirtzfeld A, Lochschmidt O, et al. Physical movement sensitive pacing: Comparison of two "activity"-triggered pacing systems. PACE 1989; 12:102-110.
13. Johnston SL, Bradding P, Watkins J. A simultaneous, noninvasive comparison with sinus rhythm, of two activity sensing, rate adaptive pacemakers, in an elderly population. PACE 1991; 14:20-27.
14. Astrand I. Aerobic work capacity in men and women. Acta Physiol Scand 1960; 49(Suppl. 169):1-92.
15. Lau C-P, Stott JRR, Toff WD, et al. Selective vibration sensing: A new concept for activity-sensing rate-responsive pacing. PACE 1988; 11:1299-1309.
16. Alt E, Matula M, Theres H, et al. The basis for activity controlled rate variable cardiac pacemakers: An analysis of mechanical forces on the human body induced by exercise and environment. PACE 1989; 12:1667-1680.
17. Lau C-P. The range of sensors and algorithms used in rate adaptive cardiac pacing. PACE 1992; 15:1177-1211.
18. Moura PJ, Gessman LJ, Lai T, et al. Chronotropic response of an activity sensing pacemaker compared with the normal sinus node. PACE 1987; 10:78-86.
19. Lau CP, Mehta D, Toff WD, et al. Limitations of rate response of an activity-sensing rate-responsive pacemaker to different forms of activity. PACE 1988; 11:141-150.
20. Matula M, Alt E, Fotuhi P, et al. Rate adaption of activity pacemakers under various types of means of locomotion, (abstract) Eur JCPE 1992; 2:A49.
21. Toff WD, Leeks C, Joy M, et al. Activity-sensing pacemaker function during air travel. (abstract) PACE 1987; 10:424.
22. Kubish K, Peters W, Chiladakis I, et al. Clinical experience with rate responsive pacemaker Sensolog 703. PACE 1988; 11:1829-1833.
23. Alagona P, Greenwald K, Funk R, et al. Comparison of vibration vs. accelerometer based rate adaptive pacemakers during helicopter transport. (abstract) Eur JCPE 1992; 2:62.
24. Roberts D, Baxter S, Brennan P, et al. A comparison of externally strapped versus implanted accelerometer or vibration based rate-adaptive pacemakers during daily activities, (abstract) PACE 1993; 16:904.
25. Hayes DL, Feldt LV, Higano ST. Standardized informal exercise testing for programming rate adaptive pacemakers. PACE 1991; 14:1772-1776.
26. Stratton JR, Levy WC, Cerqueira MD. Cardiovascular responses to exercise. Effects of aging and exercise training in healthy men. Circulation 1994; 89:1648-1655.