Condition monitoring strategy—a risk based interval selection

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 285-296

  Murty, Akella S R ^a   Naikan, V N A ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAILURE (MECHANICAL); MACHINERY; MAINTAINABILITY; MONITORING; RELIABILITY; RISKS; SERVICE LIFE;

CONDITION MONITORING; RISK BASED INTERVAL SELECTION;

MAINTENANCE;

EID: 0029772441     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207549608904902     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Angelo, M. R., 1989, Vibration Monitoring of Machines. Maintenance Management International, 7, 135-154.
2. Blake, M. P., 1964, New Vibration Standard for Maintenance. Hydrocarbon Processing and Petroleum Refiner, January, 1964.
3. Bloch, H. P. and Geitner, F. P., Practical Management for Process Plants: I. Improving Machining Reliability.
4. Glew, C. A. W., 1975, The effectiveness of vibration analysis as a maintenance tool.Transactions of the Institute of Marine Engineers, 86, (2), 29-50.
5. Jackson, C., 1975, Practical Vibrations, Hydrocarbon Processing, November 1975.
6. Kingston, J., 1992, The use of trending in predictive maintenance. Noise 4 Vibration Worldwide, July 1992.
7. Neale, M., 1986, Condition Monitoring Methods and Economics, Maintenance, 1(4), 7-12.
8. Sherie, Y. S., 1981, Optimal maintenance models for systems subject to failure-a review. Nov. Res. Log. Quart., 28(1), 47-74.
9. Thomas, L. C., 1986, A Survey of Maintenance and Replacement Models for Maintainability and Reliability of Multi-item Systems. Reliability Engineering, 16(4), 297-309