Monitoring progress for improved outcomes

Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 47-76

  David, Kathryn Steyer ^a,b  

^a Heartland Area Education Agency 11   (United States)

^b Bureau of Special Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0029769920     PISSN: 01942638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/J006v16n04_04     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Physical Therapy Association: Outcomes Effectiveness of Physical Therapy: An Annotated Bibliography. Alexandria, VA: Author; 1994.
2. Shields RK, Leo KC, Miller B, Dostal WF, Barr R: An acute care physical therapy clinical practice database for outcomes research. Phys Ther. 1994; 74:463-470.
3. Hamilton BB, Granger CV: Disability outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Phys Ther. 1994; 74:494-503.
4. Goals 2000: Educate America Act, P.L. 103-125, 20 USC 5801 et seq.
5. National Association of School Psychologists: Assessment and Eligibility in Special Education: An Examination of Policy and Practice with Proposals for Change. Alexandria, VA: author; 1994.
6. Tilly WD, Grimes J, Reschly DJ: Special education system reform: The Iowa story. Communiqué of the National Association of School Psychologists; Sept.-Dec., 1993.
7. Bureau of Special Education, Iowa Department of Education: Professional practices in problem solving. Des Moines, IA: author; 1994.
8. Tilly WD, Flugum, KR: Best practices in ensuring quality interventions, in Thomas A & Grimes J (eds): Best Practices in School Psychology-III. Washington DC, National Association of School Psychologists; 1995.
9. Rothstein JM, Echternach JL: Hypothesis-oriented algorithm for clinicians: A method for evaluation and treatment planning. Phys Ther. 66:1388-1394, 1986.
10. Magistro, CM: Clinical decision making in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1989;69:525-534.
11. Palisano, RJ, Campbell, SK, Harris SR: Clinical decision-making in pediatric physical therapy, in Campbell SK (ed): Physical Therapy for Children. Philadelphia, Saunders; 1994.
12. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1991, Public Law 102-119, 20 USC 1400 et seq.
13. Gonnella C: Single-subject experimental paradigm as a clinical decision tool. Phys Ther. 1989; 69:601-609.
14. Fuchs LS, Fuchs D: The relationship between methods of graphing student performance data and achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology. 1987;8(3):5-13.
15. Fuchs LS, Fuchs, D: Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children. 1986; 53:199-208.
16. Slaven S, Sullivan M, David K: Survey of Preprogress Monitoring Practices: A Pilot Study. Unpublished manuscript. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education; 1995.
17. Sulzer-Azaroff B, Mayer GR: Behavior Analysis for Lasting Change. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc.; 1991.
18. Heriza C: Motor development: traditional and contemporary theories, in Lister MJ (ed): Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems: Proceedings of the II Step Conference. Alexandria, VA: The Foundation for Physical Therapy; 1991, pp 99-126.
19. Iowa Department of Education: Student Improvement is Job #1: Monitoring Student Progress. Des Moines, IA; Author; 1994.
20. Slaven S, Sullivan M, David K: Professional Practices of Physical Therapists and Occupational Therapists After Using Progress Monitoring: A Pilot Study. Unpublished manuscript. Des Moines, IA: Department of Education, Bureau of Special Education; 1995.
21. Folio MR, Fewell RR: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards Manual. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources; 1983.
22. Bruininks R: Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services; 1978.
23. Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S: The Gross Motor Function Measure: Reliability, validity and responsiveness of an evaluation instrument. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1989; 31:341-352.
24. Haley SM, Faas RM, Coster WJ, Gans BM, Webster HM: Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Boston: New England Medical Center; 1989.
25. Shinn MR, Good III RH, Knutson N, Tilly III WD, & Collins VL: Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review. 1992; 21:459-479.