Allometric relationships to estimate above–ground dry–mass and height in Salix

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 11, Issue 1-4, 1996, Pages 233-241

  Tahvanainen, Liisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Allometric relationship; Dry mass; Height; Non linear models; Salix

Indexed keywords

SALIX;

EID: 0029769491     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589609382932     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ager, A., Rönnberg–Wästljung, A. C., Thorsén, J., and Sirén, G., 1986. Genetic improvement of willows for energy forestry in Sweden, Report 43 49Swedish university of Agricultural Sciences. ISBN 91–576–2740–1
2. Albrektson, A., 1984. Sapwood basal area and needle mass of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees in central Sweden. Forestry, 57:35–43.
3. Anon. 1983. Rekisteröidyt pajukloonit 1.5.1983, Internal report 28Vantaa, Finland:Finnish Forest Research Institute, Department of Forest genetics. Forest Genetics Register. (In Finnish.)
4. Baskerville, G. L., 1972. Use of the logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res., 2:49–53.
5. Björklund, T., and Ferm, A., 1982. Biomass and technical properties of small–sized birch and grey alder. Folia For., 500:37 ISBN 951–40–0598–8. (In Finnish with English summary.)
6. Bormann, B. T., 1990. Diameter–based biomass regression models ignore large sapwood–related variation in Sitka spruce. Can. J. For. Res., 20:1098–1104.
7. Clough, B. F., and Scott, K., 1989. Allometric relationships for estimating above–ground biomass in six mangrove species. For. Ecol. Manag., 27:117–127.
8. Crow, T. R., and Laidly, P. R., 1980. Alternative models for estimating woody plant biomass. Can. J. For. Res., 10:367–370.
9. Ford, E. D., and Newbould, P. J., 1970. Stand structure and dry weight production through the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) coppice cycle. J. Ecol., 58:275–296.
10. Gholz, H. L., Grier, C. C., Campell, A. G., and Brown, A. T., 1979. Equations and their use for estimating biomass and leaf area of plants in the Pacific Northwest, Research Paper 41 1–37. Corvallis:Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University.
11. Hakkila, P., 1989. Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass, Springer Series in Wood Science 575Berlin–Heidelberg:Springer–Verlag. ISBN 3–540–50299–8
12. Hari, P., Heikinheimo, P., Mäkelä, A., Kaipiainen, L., Korpilahti, E., and Samela, J., 1986. Trees as water transport system. Silva Fenn., 20:205–210.
13. Hytönen, J., 1985. Leafless aboveground biomass production of Salix ’Aquatica’ fertilized with industrial sludge. Folia For., 614:16 ISBN 951–40–0691–7. (In Finnish with English summary.)
14. Hytönen, J., Lumme, I., and Törmälä, T., 1987. Comparison of methods for estimating willow biomass. Biomass, 14:39–49.
15. Judge, G. G., Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C., Lütkepohl, H., and Lee, T.–C., 1985. The Theory and Practise of Econometrics, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics 1019New York:John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0–471–89530–X
16. Mäkelä, A., 1986. Implications of the pipe model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. J. Theor. Biol., 123:103–120.
17. Ohlsson, T., 1986. Produktionsresultat i svenska odlingar av energiskog, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences 76 ISBN 91–576–2855. (In Swedish.)
18. Olsson, L., and Flower–Ellis, J. G. K., 1986. Structure and some dimensional relations of six clones of Salix and one clone of Populus (trichocarpa × deltoides) from a clonal trial at Stutsvik, Sweden, Technical Report no. 7 48Energy Forestry Project (EFP) Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. ISBN 91–576–0495–9
19. Pohjonen, V., 1991a. Selection of species and clones for biomass willow forestry in Finland. Acta For. Fenn., 221:58 ISBN 951–651–091–4
20. Pohjonen, V., 1991b. Volume equations and volume tables of Juniperus procera Höchst. For. Ecol. Manag., 44:185–200.
21. Roininen, H., 1991. The ecology and evolution of the host plant relationship among willow–feeding sawflies, 21Finland:University of Joensuu. PhD thesis ISBN 951–708–036–0
22. Shinozaki, K., Yoda, K., Hozumi, K., and Kira, T., 1964. A quantitative analyses of plant form—the pipe model theory I. Basic analyses. Jpn J. Ecol., 14:97–105.
23. Smolander, H., and Sievänen, R., 1990. Vesi kasvutekijänä:Kasvien haihdunnan ja fotosynteesin kytkennän tarkastelua. In Lahti, T. & Smolander, H. (eds). Johdatus metsien perustuotantobiologiaan. University of Joensuu, Department of Forestry. Silva Carelica, 16:129–151. (In Finnish.)
24. Snell, J. A. K., and Brown, J. K., 1978. Comparison of tree biomass estimators—DBH and sapwood area. For. Sci., 24:455–457.
25. Telenius, B., and Verwijst, T., 1995. The influence of allometric variation, vertical biomass distribution and sampling procedure on biomass estimates in commercial short rotation forests. Bioresour. Technol., 51:245–253.
26. Verwijst, T., 1990. Clonal differences in the structure of a mixed stand of Salix viminalis in response to Melampsora and frost. Can. J. For. Res., 20:602–605.
27. Verwijst, T., 1991. Logarithmic transformations in biomass estimation procedures:violation of the linearity assumption in regression analysis. Biomass Bioen., 1:175–180.
28. Whitehead, D., Edwards, W. R. N., and Jarvis, P. G., 1984. Conducting sapwood area, foliage area, and permeability in mature trees of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Can. J. For. Res., 14:940–947.
29. Whitehead, D., and Jarvis, P. G., 1981. “ Coniferous forests and plantations ”. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Edited by:Kozlowski, T. T., Vol. 6, 49–152. New York:Academic Press. ISBN 0–12–424156–5
30. Wittaker, R. H., and Marks, P. L., 1975. “ Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity ”. In Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Ecological Studies 14 Edited by:Lieth, H., and Wittaker, R. H., 55–118. New York:Springer–Verlag. ISBN 0–387–07083–4
31. Vuokila, Y., 1960. Tree volume functions and tables for larch. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn., 51.10:1–89. (In Finnish with English summary.)